Which term should be chosen for u(x) in integration by parts?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the indefinite integral of the function ∫(x^2/(2+x^3)) dx. The correct integration by parts formula is confirmed, but participants suggest that integration by parts may not be necessary for this problem. Instead, a substitution of u = x^3 is recommended to simplify the integral to a standard form. Additionally, it's noted that selecting the term whose derivative approaches zero quickly, such as x^2, can aid in the integration process. Ultimately, the consensus is that simpler methods exist for solving this integral without resorting to integration by parts.
zanazzi78
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
ok i`m really struggling with the concept.
I've been asked to find the indefinite integral of;

\int \frac{x^2}{(2+ x^3)} dx

so before i beg for the answer could someone confirm that i`ve got the right rule to solve this;

\int u(x) v'(x) = [ u(x) v(x)] - \int v(x) u'(x)

if this is right would you mind giving a suggestion to what u(x) to use?

p.s. i may have to edit this if latex doesn`t come out right I've been having trouble with it and only jointed the forum a few day's ago!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is the correct formula (it's surely in your textbook), but I don't see any good reason for using integration by parts. That's a fairly standard anti-derivative: look up "arctangent".
 
I`ve just edited it. Now it`s integration by parts! see I`m getting all flustered
 
Actually, you still don't need integration by parts. Substituting u = x^3 will simplify it to a standard form.

Anyways, since differentiation is in some sense the inverse operation to integration, every differentiation rule yields an integration rule. I'm sure you remember the product rule:

\frac{d}{dx}(f(x) g(x)) = f^\prime (x) g(x) + g^\prime (x) f(x)

Rearraging the equation above gives

f(x) g^\prime (x) = \left[f(x) g(x)\right]^\prime - f^\prime(x)g(x)

And integrating both sides with respect to x gives

\int f(x) g^\prime (x) \ dx = \int \left(\frac{d}{dx} (f(x) g(x)) - f^\prime(x)g(x)\right) \ dx

but certainly, \int \frac{d}{dx}(f(x)g(x)) \ dx = f(x)g(x), so this just reduces to

\int f(x)g^\prime (x) \ dx = f(x)g(x) - \int g(x) f^\prime (x) \ dx

which is what your teacher probably called the formula for integration by parts.
 
Last edited:
x^{2}dx=\frac{1}{3}d(2+x^{3}) so the integration is simple...

Daniel.
 
zanazzi78 said:
ok i`m really struggling with the concept.
I've been asked to find the indefinite integral of;

\int \frac{x^2}{(2+ x^3)} dx

so before i beg for the answer could someone confirm that i`ve got the right rule to solve this;

\int u(x) v'(x) = [ u(x) v(x)] - \int v(x) u'(x)

if this is right would you mind giving a suggestion to what u(x) to use?

p.s. i may have to edit this if latex doesn`t come out right I've been having trouble with it and only jointed the forum a few day's ago!
As others have said, you don't have to use integration by parts to solve this, but ...

Pick the term whose derivative will eventually go to zero (the soonest). In this case, it's x^2. First derivative is 2x. Second derivative is 2. Third derivative is 0.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top