Integration of an energy balance equation, with respect to time.

lukea125
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys, I was hoping someone would be able to help me with this integration. It's been killing me haha.

I've got this energy balance equation:

mgh = 0.5m(v^2) + 0.5I(w^2) + T(theta)

Basically, It's a gravitational potential energy that is converted to a velocity of a falling object, a rotating flywheel and some frictional Torque (T). v is velocity, and w is angular velocity. I is the moment of inertia, which is known.

I need to integrate this expression with respect to time, t. I can relate velocity to angular velocity by: 0.0395w. I also thought I could express theta as angular velocity multiplied by time.

Any help would be greatly appreciated as I cannot get this out at all.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi lukea125! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and an omega: ω :wink:)
lukea125 said:
I also thought I could express theta as angular velocity multiplied by time.

no :redface:

you have (dθ/dt)2 as a function of θ …

so square-root it, separate the variables, and integrate :wink:
 
Thanks Tiny-Tim! I really appreciate it. I'll give it a go and see what I can get.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
736
Replies
138
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top