Integration (Related to Physics)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion between differentiation and integration in the context of the equation for a straight line, y = mx + c. The user initially attempts to derive the slope (m) using the incorrect formula m = y/x, leading to a misunderstanding of differentiation. Clarifications highlight that the correct slope is defined as m = Δy/Δx and that the derivative of the equation yields m directly, not through the user's method. The user acknowledges the mix-up between integration and differentiation, indicating a need for further understanding of these concepts. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of correctly applying differentiation rules in physics-related equations.
_Mayday_
Messages
808
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Integration (Related to Physics)

This shouldn't take long :smile:

I have been given the general equation for a straight line which is:

y=mx+c

Now I know that to determine the gradient I can use:

m=\frac{y}{x}

Here is my question. Can I differentiate the initial equation given to get to m=\frac{y}{x}

If so, which I am sure you can, then I seem to have come across a problem, though I think it is a problem in my differentiation.

y=mx=c

\frac{dy}{dx}=mx^{-1}

m=\frac{y}{x^{-1}}

or

m=\frac{x}{y}

This does not agree with my initial statement. Either my differentiation is incorrect or I need to touch up on my laws of indices, and if neither of these maybe I am deluded and this can't be done anyway :-p

_Mayday_
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(1) The slope is given by m = \Delta y / \Delta x, not m = y/x.
(2) The derivative (with respect to x) of mx + c is just m.
 
Doc Al said:
(1) The slope is given by m = \Delta y / \Delta x, not m = y/x.
(2) The derivative (with respect to x) of mx + c is just m.

Just noticed the thread title is integration not differentiation. Thank you for your help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top