Intensity from the double slit.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the intensity expression for laser light passing through a double slit setup. The initial attempt at the solution presented an intensity formula, but confusion arose regarding the factor of 4 in the expression. Clarification was provided that this factor depends on the definition of maximal intensity, either from a double slit or a single slit perspective. Additionally, when examining the case where the distance between slits equals their width, it was noted that this does not yield a double slit pattern. The final derivation confirmed that with specific substitutions, the intensity formula aligns with the single-slit diffraction pattern for a slit width of 2a.
sg001
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Laser light of wavelength λ is incident onto a pair of narrow slits of width a and spacing dWrite down an expression for the intensity as a function of angle of the angle measured from the central axis, θ, in the far-*‐field

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was just the product of single and double slit diffraction, i.e...

I= I0cos2(∏dsinθ/λ)(sin(∏asinθ/λ)/∏asinθ/λ))2but the answer was I= 4I0cos2(∏dsinθ/λ)(sin(∏asinθ/λ)/∏asinθ/λ))2im not sure where this 4 has come from??

also how would I show if d=a then this formula turns into the double slit pattern.??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The prefactor depends on the definition of I0.
If you define it as "maximal intensity with a double-slit", the prefactor is 1.
If you define it as "maximal intensity with a single slit", it is 4.

also how would I show if d=a then this formula turns into the double slit pattern.??
If the distance between the slit centers is equal to the slit size, why would you expect a double slit pattern?
 
mfb said:
The prefactor depends on the definition of I0.
If you define it as "maximal intensity with a double-slit", the prefactor is 1.
If you define it as "maximal intensity with a single slit", it is 4.


If the distance between the slit centers is equal to the slit size, why would you expect a double slit pattern?

Thanks,

sorry it should have been single slit with width 2a... but when I plug in d=a I can't see how that could disappear?
 
With ##x=\frac{\pi a \sin(\theta)}{\lambda}##:

$$I= I_0\cos^2\left(\frac{\pi d \sin(\theta)}{\lambda}\right) \frac{sin^2(x)}{x^2}$$
With d=a and using sin(2x)=2sin(x)cos(x):
$$I= I_0 \frac{\cos^2(x) sin^2(x)}{x^2} = I_0 \frac{1}{4} \frac{sin^2(2x)}{x^2} = I_0 \frac{sin^2(2x)}{(2x)^2}$$
Which is the single-slit pattern with 2a.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top