What is the thickness of the spacer?

AI Thread Summary
The thickness of the spacer between two glass plates can be calculated using the formula T = m(1/2 wavelength), where m represents the number of dark fringes observed. In this case, five dark fringes are noted, leading to confusion about whether m should be 4 or 5. The correct interpretation is that the answer is 4, as the question specifies "from edge to edge," indicating the number of fringes between the plates rather than the total. Thus, the thickness of the spacer is calculated as 4 x 589 nm / 2, resulting in 1178 nm. Understanding the context of the question is crucial for determining the correct value of m.
jazzchan
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

the question is ...
Two flat glass plates touch at one edge and are separated at the other edge by a spacer. Using vertical viewing and light is 589 nm(wavelength), five dark fringes(D) are obtained from edge to edge. What is the thickness of the spacer ??

i know that the thinkness of space(T) = m(1/2wavelength), but
would u mind to give me some idea for what is the m ?? is 4 or 5 ??

I think it is 5...but i checked the correct answer is 4 ?? why ?? because of 'from edge to edge' ??

best regards and thanks

JazzChan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is 4 because the fringes you are seeing are interference fringes. This means that light from one edge is interfering with light from the other edge, producing constructive and destructive interference. This only happens when the path difference between the two light sources is an integral number of wavelengths. So, the path difference between the two edges must be 4x589nm in order for the fringes to line up. Therefore, the thickness of the spacer must be 4x589nm/2 = 1178nm.
 


Hello JazzChan,

Thank you for your question regarding the interference of light. The value of "m" in the equation T = m(1/2wavelength) represents the number of dark fringes observed between the two plates. In this case, since five dark fringes are observed from edge to edge, the value of m would be 5. However, it is important to note that the equation T = m(1/2wavelength) is only applicable when the light is incident perpendicular to the plates. If the light is at an angle, the value of m may differ.

As for the discrepancy in the answer, it could be due to the wording in the question. Since the question states "from edge to edge," it is possible that the answer is asking for the number of dark fringes observed between the two plates, rather than the total number of dark fringes. In this case, the correct answer would be 4.

I hope this explanation helps clarify any confusion. Best of luck with your studies!


 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top