How Does the Residue Theorem Help in Analyzing Plane Wave Interference?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the residue theorem to analyze the interference of plane waves represented by a specific integral involving wave amplitudes. The integral includes a delta function that constrains the frequency, prompting questions about the integration limits and the potential need for a Fourier transform. Participants express confusion regarding the interpretation of the delta function in the context of the integral. There is a suggestion to tackle the integral over frequency first to simplify the analysis. Overall, the thread seeks guidance on applying the residue theorem effectively in this scenario.
AwesomeTrains
Messages
115
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I have to show that the interference of plane waves: f^{(\pm)}(\vec r,t)=\int \frac {d^3k}{(2\pi)^{3/2}}\int \frac {d\omega}{(2\pi)^{1/2}}e^{i(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t)}\tilde f^{(\pm)}(\vec k, \omega)

where the amplitudes are given as: \tilde f^{(\pm)}(\vec k, \omega)=\frac {2\delta(\omega-\omega_0)}{k^2-(\omega\pm i\delta)^2/c^2}
is a spherical wave of the form: f^{(\pm)}(\vec r, t)=\frac{1}{r}e^{-i\omega_0(t\mp r/c)}

Homework Equations


They recommend that I use the residue theorem.

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought about doing some sort of coordinate transformation.
What are the integration limits? They weren't given, do I have to figure those out?
Would it be useful to do a Fourier transform of the amplitudes?

Any tips to get me started are really appreciated. (I get confused when I look at the integral)

Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thought about it. I guess I should do the integral over d\omega first, but what is the meaning of this \delta in (ω±iδ)^2/c^2 I know that it's the delta function when it has some argument but there it hasn't.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top