Internal-Combustion Engine Prototypes Ranking Task?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cupcake
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Ranking
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on ranking internal combustion engines based on their designed power output and thermal efficiency. Users calculated power output using the formula P=Work/t, where Work is derived from Qin-Qout, but encountered discrepancies with their results. The thermal efficiency formula discussed is 1-Qout/Qin, which is intended for a subsequent ranking task. Despite calculations appearing correct, the original poster received incorrect feedback from the mastering physics platform. The conversation highlights the challenges of accurately applying formulas in physics homework.
cupcake
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Rank these engines on the basis of their designed power output and their thermal efficiency.

1) Qin = 3000 J, Qout = 1500 J, f=150 Hz.
2) Qin = 4000 J, Qout = 3000 J, f=50 Hz.
3) Qin = 1000 J, Qout = 200 J, f=200 Hz.
4) Qin = 2000 J, Qout = 500 J, f=50 Hz.
5) Qin = 2000 J, Qout = 1000 J, f=100 Hz.
6) Qin = 1500 J, Qout = 500 J, f=200 Hz.

Homework Equations



P=Work/t, and Work=Qin-Qout

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the power output using the above formulas, where t=1/f, but I don't know why my answers are wrong... this is mastering physics question :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cupcake said:

Homework Statement




Rank these engines on the basis of their designed power output and their thermal efficiency.

1) Qin = 3000 J, Qout = 1500 J, f=150 Hz.
2) Qin = 4000 J, Qout = 3000 J, f=50 Hz.
3) Qin = 1000 J, Qout = 200 J, f=200 Hz.
4) Qin = 2000 J, Qout = 500 J, f=50 Hz.
5) Qin = 2000 J, Qout = 1000 J, f=100 Hz.
6) Qin = 1500 J, Qout = 500 J, f=200 Hz.

Homework Equations



P=Work/t, and Work=Qin-Qout

The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the power output using the above formulas, where t=1/f, but I don't know why my answers are wrong... this is mastering physics question :(
Perhaps you could show us your answers. What is your equation for thermal efficiency? Are you taking that into account?

AM
 
so,

1) W1=1500 P1=W1/t= 225000
2) W2=1000 P2=W2/t= 50000
3) W3=800 P3=W3/t= 160000
4) W4=1500 P4= 75000
5) W5=1000 P5=100000
5) W6=1000 P6=200000

so, the rank from the largest to the smaller will be, P1 > P6 > P3 > P5 > P4 > P2

thermal efficiency formula is 1-Qin/Qout, that one is for the next question (arrange by basis of thermal efficiency)
 
cupcake said:
so,

1) W1=1500 P1=W1/t= 225000
2) W2=1000 P2=W2/t= 50000
3) W3=800 P3=W3/t= 160000
4) W4=1500 P4= 75000
5) W5=1000 P5=100000
5) W6=1000 P6=200000

so, the rank from the largest to the smaller will be, P1 > P6 > P3 > P5 > P4 > P2

thermal efficiency formula is 1-Qin/Qout, that one is for the next question (arrange by basis of thermal efficiency)
Looks right. What is the problem?

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
Looks right. What is the problem?

AM

I don't know..masteringphysics said it's wrong :(
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top