Internal Energy Changes in Various Systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the internal energy changes in various systems, particularly focusing on a clay ball dropped to the ground, an exothermic reaction between hydrogen and oxygen, and a car driven at constant speed. It is clarified that when a clay ball hits the ground, its kinetic energy converts to internal energy, resulting in a positive change in internal energy (ΔU) as the clay heats up. In the case of an exothermic reaction at constant volume, heat is removed from the system, leading to a negative q and a corresponding negative ΔU. The conversation emphasizes that no work is done in a constant volume scenario, and the kinetic energy loss of the clay ball contributes to its internal energy increase. Overall, the key takeaway is that changes in kinetic energy can lead to changes in internal energy, affecting temperature.
brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


In which of the following cases does the internal energy of the described system increase:
(I) A clay ball is dropped and sticks to the ground
(II) Hydrogen and oxygen react exothermically to form water
(III) A car is driven at constant speed (consider the effect of air resistance)

Homework Equations


NA

The Attempt at a Solution


When I look at I and III, I think of kinetic energy and potential energy (if elevated). But then when I think of internal energy, I think chemical reactions. How can a macroscopic object such as I and III have an increase in internal energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a chemical reaction is carried out exothermally in a constant volume reactor, does that mean that heat is added to the reactor or that heat is removed form the reactor to return the temperature of products to the original temperature of the reactants? So what is the sign of Q? What does that tell you about the sign of ΔU?

If a falling ball of clay has kinetic energy when it hits the ground and the deformation of the clay takes place without any heat transfer from the clay to its surroundings, does the ground do work to deform the clay? What does that tell you about the sign of ΔU?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Erico Romaric
If the volume remains constant when an exothermic reaction takes place, then q would be positive, which means that ΔU would be positive, right? This would mean that heat is added to the system, thus giving the system potential to do work.

KE = W with macroscopic systems, so a ball of clay with kinetic energy has the potential to do work without heat. Please let me know if my logic here is correct. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Erico Romaric
brake4country said:
If the volume remains constant when an exothermic reaction takes place, then q would be positive, which means that ΔU would be positive, right? This would mean that heat is added to the system, thus giving the system potential to do work.
Exothermic means that q is negative. Heat is removed from the system. How much work is actually done by a material in a constant volume reactor? Is ΔU positive or negative?
KE = W with macroscopic systems, so a ball of clay with kinetic energy has the potential to do work without heat. Please let me know if my logic here is correct. Thanks!
The work that the system does on the surroundings is zero, because the displacement of the ground is virtually zero. So the work done by the ground on the clay ball is also zero. Don't forget that, when there is a significant change in kinetic energy, the first law must be modified to ##ΔU+ΔKE=Q-W##. So the kinetic energy gets converted into internal energy. So, is ΔU positive or negative (i.e., does the ball of clay get hotter or colder when it goes splat?)

Chet
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Erico Romaric
Okay, a lot of great questions! So, for the first one, no work is done if the volume remains constant. This is an isovolumetric system. If heat were to go into the system, then it would be endothermic and the q would be positive.

For the second question, conceptually thinking about this I would say that the clay would get hotter due to the kinetic energy that it has upon hitting the ground. This would be similar to an exothermic process where heat is removed from the clay into the surroundings. Is this thinking correct?

Therefore, q is negative then ΔU must be negative also. Correct?
 
brake4country said:
Okay, a lot of great questions! So, for the first one, no work is done if the volume remains constant. This is an isovolumetric system. If heat were to go into the system, then it would be endothermic and the q would be positive.
Right. Since it's exothermic, q is negative.

For the second question, conceptually thinking about this I would say that the clay would get hotter due to the kinetic energy that it has upon hitting the ground. This would be similar to an exothermic process where heat is removed from the clay into the surroundings. Is this thinking correct?
No. q and w for this case are both zero. So, since ##ΔU+ΔKE=q-w##, we are left with ##ΔU=-ΔKE##. The change in kinetic energy of the clay is negative because it is initially moving and then stops. So ##ΔU>0##. The positive change in internal energy of the clay is related to the temperature rise by ##ΔU=mCΔT##. So the temperature also rises.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes brake4country
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top