Internal energy pressure dependence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of calculating enthalpy in a refrigerant 134a enthalpy-pressure diagram. The user, Mike, notes discrepancies in his program's enthalpy calculations compared to a referenced diagram, particularly in the liquid state where temperature curves are not vertical as expected. He questions how specific enthalpy can remain nearly constant despite significant pressure increases, suggesting that internal energy (u) may be dependent on pressure. The response confirms that u is indeed a function of pressure, providing a formula that explains the relationship between enthalpy, specific volume, and temperature. This clarification helps Mike move forward with his implementation.
MLars
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Physics Forums!

I am currently writing a computer program that displays an enthalpy-pressure diagram for the refrigerant 134a. I am using the data and relation between specific volume, pressure and temperature found in http://eng.sut.ac.th/me/2014/document/LabMechanical1/HFC-134a_SI.pdf. My algorithm is able to calculate the correct volume given a pressure and temperature, however the total enthalpy calculation differs from the diagram found in the above paper.

upload_2015-12-11_22-8-55.png


In particular, in the liquid state, my temperature curves are not that vertical but fall to the right as pressure increases. According to my understanding of specific enthalpy it is defined as h=u+pv where u is a function of only temperature. Now to my question. If the above is true, how can the lines in the diagram be almost vertical when the specific volume is close to constant and the pressure increases by a factor of 10(pv should increase x10). May u be dependent on pressure, compensate for the increasing pv and yield a constant enthalpy? What am I missing?

Thanks a lot
Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
u is a function of pressure. The effect of pressure on h is given by:

$$\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial P}\right)_T=v-T\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)_P$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes MLars
Chestermiller said:
u is a function of pressure. The effect of pressure on h is given by:

$$\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial P}\right)_T=v-T\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)_P$$
Alright, nice to have that confirmed! I'll start to implement it.

Thank you Chestermiller:)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top