Internal Resistance of a Real Battery

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the internal resistance of a solar cell modeled as a real battery. The solar cell generates different potential differences when connected to 400 ohm and 900 ohm resistors, leading to the need for a systematic approach to solve for internal resistance. The equations derived from the loop rule indicate a misunderstanding of whether the resistors are in series or parallel, which affects the calculations. The correct interpretation clarifies that the resistors should be treated in series with the internal resistance, leading to a more accurate solution. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying circuit configurations and eliminating variables for clarity in solving the problem.
Oijl
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solar cell generates a potential difference of 0.10 V when a 400 ohm resistor is connected across it, and a potential difference of 0.15 V when a 900 ohm resistor is substituted.

What is the internal resistance of the solar cell?


Homework Equations


E - ir - iR = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


This solar cell is a real battery, in that it has an internal resistance. But I can imagine it as being an ideal battery with emf E connected in series to a resistor of resistance r, where r is the internal resistance of the real battery. So, with this cell connected (in series) to a 400 ohm resistor of resistance R, I can say, by the loop rule,
E - ir -iR = 0

The potential differences that the question says the real cell generates would be the potential across the ideal battery and the resistor r, such that
0.10 V = E - i_{1}r
where i_{1} is the current in the case where the 400 ohm resistor is in the circuit, and
0.15 V = E - i_{2}r
where i_{2} is the current in the case where the 900 ohm resistor is in the circuit.

And again, since E - ir - iR = 0, I can also write
0.1 - 400i = 0
and
0.15 - 900i = 0

So then I have four equations and four unknowns, and I can solve.

But when I do solve for r (which, remember, represents the internal resistance of the real cell), I get 120 ohms, and the program tells me this isn't correct.

I know I was verbose, so thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And again, since E - ir - iR = 0, I can also write
0.1 - 400i = 0
Shouldn't that be E - 0.1 - 400i = 0 ?

You can easily get numerical values for the currents. In case one, applying I = V/R to the known resistor we have I = 0.1/400 = .00025 A
If you used those you would only have 2 equations to worry about.
I think your 120 ohm answer is a few times too small.
 
I thought at first that it should be E - 0.1 - 400i = 0.
Then I remembered that 0.1 V is the potential difference put out by the real battery. E represents the emf of the ideal battery, which combined with the imaginary resistor of the same resistance as the internal resistance of the real battery, would be the potential difference generated by the real battery. So we would have E - ir = 0.1.
And putting that into E - ir - iR = 0, we have 0.1 - iR = 0.

Hold on - does "connect across" mean in parallel? Because I've been treating the cell and the resistor as if they were in series. If they're in parallel, you're right, I could very simply say I = 0.1/400.
 
Yes, it worked. Thank you!
 
Oh, you are quite right: If you use the .1 V as the potential of the real battery (E plus the iR) then you have only two elements to add: 0.1 - i*400 = 0. In fact that is the equation I used to find i.
But you still need to use all three elements to find E.

E, R and the 400 ohms are all in series.
So the sum around the loop has three potentials to add.
E - iR - i*400 = 0

Good idea to put in that i*400 = 0.1 from the first equation.
But also sub in for the other i so you have an equation with only the two variables E and R. Repeat all that for the 900 ohm case and get another one with the two variables.

I wonder if your mistake was keeping i as a variable, and not realizing that there are two different currents i1 and i2 for the two cases? Best to eliminate the i in each case.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top