Internal Shear Stress Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a common figure in statics textbooks that illustrates the application of delta V to shear forces and moments. The original poster questions how adding delta V to the shear force on the right side maintains equilibrium, as it seems to create a net downward force. After contemplating the issue, they realize that delta V may actually be negative, which clarifies their confusion. This insight leads to a better understanding of the equilibrium conditions presented in the figure. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the signs of forces in statics problems.
rat4x4
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Something has been bugging me for a long time, since I took my first statics class a few years ago. I have a problem with a common figure found in many statics books. I have attached the figure to my post.

My question deals with the delta V added to the shear force on the right side of the figure. According to the textbooks, both the shear force and moment acting on the right-hand face must be increased by a small, finite amount in order to keep the segment in equilibrium. But wouldn't this take the segment out of equilibrium? I mean, you have the resultant loading acting downwards, and then you have a shear force on the right-hand face acting downwards which itself is greater than the shear force on the left hand side. Summing the forces in the y direction, wouldn't there be a net force downwards?

What am I missing here? Why does this not make sense to me and why is this figure so common in statics books?
 

Attachments

  • download.jpg
    download.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 484
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, I believe that I have figured it out. Perhaps the delta V is negative and I have always taken it to be a positive quantity.
 
Wow, what a stupid question. Sorry guys.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top