Interpolating Data with the Discrete Fourier Transform

zs96742
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone:

I have some question using the FFT in MATLAB for data interpolating. I don't know what the relation between the normal Fourier series and the real, image number.

For example, given a set of measurement data, I can use the curve fitting toolbox to fit a curve.
The general equation is f(x) = a0 + a1*cos(x*w) + b1*sin(x*w) + a2*cos(2*x*w) + b2*sin(2*x*w) for a a factor 2 Fourier series. The a0,a1,b1,a2,b2 and w can be obtained.

When I use the FFT function, it returns the Fourier transform of each column of the matrix. This matrix has real and imaginary part.

Are their any relationship between those two results ? if yes, what should I do to convert the FFT results into a normal Fourier series format?

Thank in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually when you have a Fourier transform with real and imaginary parts, the real part is the cosine transform and the imaginary part is the sine transform.

However I am not familiar with the specific algorithm, so I could be completely wrong.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top