Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasmiros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter Lab
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the interpretation of air HEPA filter results for a school project, with a focus on the presence of elements like aluminum and bromine. The inquiry is complicated by the association of the data with chemtrail conspiracy theories, which are widely discredited by the scientific community. Chemtrails are claimed to be chemical agents sprayed from aircraft, but this theory lacks scientific support, as contrails are simply water vapor. The forum emphasizes that discussions involving conspiracy theories, particularly those related to chemtrails, are not permitted. There is a notable tension regarding the credibility of sources, with one party criticizing the use of Wikipedia while relying on a questionable document. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of using scientifically validated information in environmental studies.
kasmiros
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I need some interpretation/analysis of the air HEPA filter results for my school project. I don't know exactly what are the standars of those elements(Al,Br etc.) so I can't say if they are below range or above range. Please, if someone can help me I'd be very grateful.
Here is the document: Edit: removed link to crackpot siteAnd sorry for my english, hope you understand everything.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
That website is a crackpot conspiracy website. Is this some supposed analysis of a "chemtrail"?
 
And what's wrong with it ? It's a document linked with a chemtrails
 
kasmiros said:
And what's wrong with it ? It's a document linked with a chemtrails
Chemtrails are conspiracy theory and against the rules of this forum. Contrails are the wator vapor trails left by aircraft at high altitudes.

The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some trails left by aircraft are actually chemical or biological agents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for purposes undisclosed to the general public in clandestine programs directed by government officials.[1] This theory is not accepted by the scientific community, which states that they are just normal contrails, and that there is no scientific evidence supporting the chemtrail theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory#Contrails_vs_chemtrails
 
Jesus man, wikipedia ? seriously ?
Then ok, if you don't want to work with materials that are linked with policy etc. maybe just look at this like on a normal document ?
 
kasmiros said:
Jesus man, wikipedia ? seriously ?

You are linking to a random web document, but you are criticizing use of a wikipedia link?
 
kasmiros said:
Jesus man, wikipedia ? seriously ?
Then ok, if you don't want to work with materials that are linked with policy etc. maybe just look at this like on a normal document ?
I wanted to post something you might understand.

Sorry, but we don't allow crackpot conspiracy theories and chemtrails are crackpot conspiracy theories.
 

Similar threads

How does the Clair air purifier's e2f filter affect fan sizing?
Replies
2
Views
3K
MATLAB Fix Filtering Frequencies Code in Matlab w/o Built-In Filters
Replies
3
Views
2K
Defining Variables for Data Analysis in a Lab Experiment
Replies
1
Views
1K
Automotive What is the Velocity of Air Entering the Air Filter?
Replies
4
Views
4K
Can Electrostatic Precipitation Improve Air Quality in a Homemade Clean Room?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Formula derivation connecting vertical water flowrate & horizontal distance moved by a suspended sphere
5
Replies
207
Views
8K
Admissions Latebloomer with many past mistakes applying to graduate school
Replies
9
Views
2K
Python Python workflow for experimental data analysis
Replies
6
Views
4K
Upper division physics lab -- Project ideas
Replies
6
Views
2K
Polarized light filtering question.
Replies
4
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top