Interpretation of electronic bands in a solid

Keru
Messages
20
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The exercise asks many questions about the following E(k) diagram, but I'm more interested in understanding some basic things about it, from which I'm sure i'll be able to find the answers I'm requested.

bands.png

1) What do the bands actually correspond to? Is the lowest band corresponding to 1s2 molecular orbital, the upper to 2s2 2p6 and so on?
2) I have several diagrams and all of them contain a "Γ", what is the meaning of that 'k' apparently common to every band diagram?
3) Looking at the Fermi level, would this statements be true?
3.1) At 0K the first 4 bands would be full, and the rest empty.
3.2) At a little higher temperature (let's say 0,1eV more for the Fermi level), the first three bands would be full, while the next two partially filled.
4) If 1) was correct, by looking at the intersection of Fermi level and Γ, the graphic could only correspond to the semimetals Ge or As, right?

Thanks in advantage for any help.
 

Attachments

  • bands.png
    bands.png
    24.1 KB · Views: 439
Physics news on Phys.org
This site has some good explanations. Basically, the Γ corresponds to a specific symmetry direction in k-space. One comment on your point 4) - Ge is a semiconductor, not a semimetal.

EDIT - I meant to say a particular symmetry direction.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top