Proving the Intersection of Subspaces is a Subspace: A Vector Space Proof

AI Thread Summary
To prove that the intersection of two subspaces H and K of a vector space V is itself a subspace, it is essential to demonstrate that this intersection is non-empty and closed under scalar multiplication and addition. The zero vector is present in both H and K, confirming that the intersection H ∩ K is non-empty. For any vectors x and y in H ∩ K, and scalars α and β, the linear combination αx + βy remains in both H and K, thus also in H ∩ K. This confirms that the intersection is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. Therefore, H ∩ K is a subspace of V.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi can someone please help me with the following question. Such questions always trouble me because I don't know where to start and/or cannot continue after starting.

Q. Let H and K be subspaces of a vector space V. Prove that the intersection of K and H is a subspace of V.

By the way that the question is set out I figure that all I need to show is that the intersection of K and H is non-empty, closed under scalar multiplication and addition. So here is what I've tried.

H and K are subspaces of the vector space V so they both contain the zero vector. So it follows that the intersection contains the zeor vector so that H \cap K \ne \emptyset.

That's all I can think of. I'm not sure if I can make any other assumptions about vectors which are common to H and K and so I cannot continue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now show that a lineair combination of vectors of H \cap K is still in H \cap K.
 
Thanks for your response but that's the sort of thing that I'm having trouble with. All I've been able to show is that the zero vector is in the intersection. I don't know which are vectors are in the intersection. I cannot figure out what else I extract from the stem of the question to assist me. It's probably just a conceptual thing but I can't really see what I can and can't use.
 
Well you already showed it's not empty. Now take the scalars \alpha ,\beta \in \mathbb{R} (or any other field of course) and the vectors \vec x,\vec y \in H \cap K[/tex]. Now, since the vectors are in both subspaces, we can say that:<br /> \alpha \vec x + \beta \vec y \in H<br /> \alpha \vec x + \beta \vec y \in K<br /> <br /> And thus: \alpha \vec x + \beta \vec y \in H \cap K
 
Ok thanks for the help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top