Interstellar Movie - Conservation of Angular Momentum

AI Thread Summary
In "Interstellar," the ship generates rotation to create centrifugal force for simulated gravity, raising questions about the conservation of angular momentum. The initial angular momentum of the ship is zero, but when the engines fire, the gases expelled create an opposite angular momentum, conserving the overall angular momentum of the system. This principle mirrors how rockets increase linear momentum, where the expelled gases provide the necessary counterbalance. Additionally, rotation can be controlled using gyroscopes or flywheels, highlighting that the ship is not a closed system. Understanding these mechanics clarifies how the ship's rotation is achieved without violating conservation laws.
robbertypob
Messages
25
Reaction score
5
OK, so I'm right in the middle of watching Interstellar and I've just seen the part where they have docked with the 'mothership' and they fire up their engines to get it to rotate. This is so they can generate a centrifugal force to simulate gravity.

My question is - first the ship was not rotating and they took action to make it rotate. How could this possibly be? Angular momentum started at 0 and was increased without any apparent external torque being applied.

Please could somebody help me out?
 
  • Like
Likes PFuser1232
Physics news on Phys.org
robbertypob said:
How could this possibly be? Angular momentum started at 0 and was increased without any apparent external torque being applied.
Do you understand how rockets increase their linear momentum, without violating momentum conservation? Angular momentum is analogous.
 
Whole system(rocket + gases, which came out of engines) angular momentum was conserved. Gases, which came out of engines got opposite angular momentum.

Just like linear momentum is conserved when rocket accelerates - gases ,which come out of engine get opposite linear momentum,so whole system linear momentum is conserved.
robbertypob said:
My question is - first the ship was not rotating and they took action to make it rotate.
Only the ship is not closed system. Closed system is ship +Gases ,which come out of engines.
 
Last edited:
Even without rockets you can control a craft's rotation using gyroscopes/flywheels.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top