[Intro QM] A bit confused on spin of system notation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the notation used in Griffiths' treatment of the total spin of two spin-1/2 particles, specifically the expression ##\chi=\chi_1\chi_2##. Participants clarify that ##\chi_1## and ##\chi_2## represent the spin states of individual particles, and the notation suggests a combined wave function for both particles. The conversation emphasizes the need for a function that, when multiplied by its complex conjugate, yields the joint probability density for finding particle 1 in a specific range and particle 2 in another. This highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the notation to accurately describe the system's quantum state. Understanding this combined wave function is crucial for analyzing the behavior of multiple quantum particles.
Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
1. In Griffiths, in the section where he discusses the 'total' spin of two spin 1/2 particles (''Addition of angular momenta'') he starts of using a notation new to me. Namely ##\chi=\chi_1\chi_2## where I know what ##\chi_1## and ##\chi_2## represent independently, which has been discussed in the previous chapter. They were a representation of the spin relative to a basis before, and hence vectors. How to read this notation, is it a product? Is it some union-type of thing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is kind of a sloppy notation.

Think what chi(x) means for a single particle. It means when you take chi*(x) times chi(x) you get the probability density function, that is, the probability that the particle will be found in the range dx of x.

What will you write down for two particles? Think about a combined wave function for particle 1 and particle 2. So chi1(x1) gives, after the same process, the probability density function for particle 1 to be in dx1 of x1, and chi2(x2) gives the same for particle 2 in dx2 of x2.

So what function would you need so that when you took chi* times chi you got the probability that particle 1 was in dx1 and particle 2 was in dx2?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top