Introductory Mechatronics Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing circuits using normally closed and normally open push buttons to generate specific logic outputs. The original poster seeks help with their circuit designs, which aim to produce a logic '0' when the button is pressed and a logic '1' when released. Feedback indicates that the initial circuit designs were incorrect, as the output connections were improperly configured. A correction was provided, clarifying that the output must be connected appropriately to reflect the desired logic states. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate circuit representation and understanding logic states in mechatronics.
baillik
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Okay, two questions:
1) Using a normally closed push button, design and sketch a circuit that will generate a logic '0' when the button is pressed, and a logic '1' when the button is released
2) Using a normally open push button, design and sketch a circuit that will generate a logic '0' when the button is pressed and a logic '1' when the button is released.

My answers are the in the attached pictures, sorry about the sad paint drawings haha. I really have no idea what I am doing and I have no access to the answers, so any help at all would be appreciated.
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    888 bytes · Views: 439
  • 2.png
    2.png
    806 bytes · Views: 442
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your circuits look correct for giving the logical "0" and "1". However, you might want to show the normally closed switch like this (shown closed):

[PLAIN]http://www.kpsec.freeuk.com/symbols/swpbrk.gif

And the normally open switch like this (shown open):

[PLAIN]http://www.kpsec.freeuk.com/symbols/swpush.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dlgoff said:
Your circuits look correct for giving the logical "0" and "1". However, you might want to show the normally closed switch like this (shown closed):

[PLAIN]http://www.kpsec.freeuk.com/symbols/swpbrk.gif

And the normally open switch like this (shown open):

[PLAIN]http://www.kpsec.freeuk.com/symbols/swpush.gif[/QUOTE]


okay, I will change that.
thank you for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually both circuits are not correct.

If the output is connected to one of the supply rails, then the output will not be affected by the switch.

[PLAIN]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4222062/logic.PNG

In the circuit at left, if the switch is closed, the output will be high, but go low if the switch is opened.

In the circuit at right, the output will be low if the switch is closed, but high if it is open.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks vk6kro for catching this. I had his circuits reversed in my mind and didn't notice where his outputs were taken from.

@ baillik: Sorry about that.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top