Introductory quantum mechanics problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a quantum mechanics problem involving the momentum operator and an arbitrary function A(x). Participants clarify that the expression for the commutator [px, A(x)] should not have ħ in the denominator, as this contradicts dimensional analysis. The correct formulation reveals that [px, A(x)] simplifies to -iħ*(dA(x)/dx). One user successfully evaluates the commutator and confirms their result aligns with the expected outcome, prompting a suggestion to consult the professor about a potential typo in the assignment. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper operator handling and dimensional consistency in quantum mechanics.
phys-student
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider A(x) is an arbitrary function of x, and px is the momentum operator. Show that they satisfy the following condition:
[px,A(x)] = (-i/ħ)*d/dx(A(x))

where [px,A(x)] = pxA(x) - A(x)px

Homework Equations


ħ = h/2π
px = (-iħ)d/dx

The Attempt at a Solution


Starting with the expression given at the bottom of the question and subbing in the expression for the momentum operator and factoring out -iħ, I get:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(d/dx(A(x)) - A(x)d/dx)

and I'm stuck there for the time being... I don't really understand how to get ħ into the denominator or what to do with the term in brackets. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phys-student said:

Homework Statement


Consider A(x) is an arbitrary function of x, and px is the momentum operator. Show that they satisfy the following condition:
[px,A(x)] = (-i/ħ)*d/dx(A(x))
There must be a misprint in the problem as given to you. The ħ should be in the numerator. You can verify this by dimensional analysis.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Starting with the expression given at the bottom of the question and subbing in the expression for the momentum operator and factoring out -iħ, I get:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(d/dx(A(x)) - A(x)d/dx)

When unraveling commutators like this, it is usually a good idea the think of the commutator as acting on some arbitrary function f(x).

Thus, try to simplify [px, A(x)]f(x).
 
h-bar should not be in the denominator. Do a simple unit analysis to see that's not the case.

As for evaluating the commutator, I think it might help if you put the commutator in front of function. Remember p and A are operators, they need to operate on something.

[p,A]\psi = (pA - Ap)\psi = pA\psi - Ap\psi

Now A and psi are just functions of position. But p is a derivative operator acting on everything to its right. Recall the product rule.

pA\psi = p(A)\psi + Ap(\psi)

I'll let you do the rest. Hopefully this makes sense.
 
Thanks to both of you for the help. I've done as you suggested and solved the commutator and found that it was equal to dA(x)/dx, now the answer I have is:

[px,A(x)] = -iħ*(dA(x)/dx)

Another source I've seen online seems to suggest that the first term should be ħ/i (which is equal to my answer -iħ) I will ask my professor whether there is a typo in the assignment tomorrow.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top