Invariant subspaces under linear operators

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof regarding invariant subspaces under linear operators, specifically addressing the statement: If U is a subspace of V that is invariant under every operator on V, then U must be either {0} or V. A counterexample is provided where U is neither {0} nor V, demonstrating that U is not invariant under a defined linear operator T. The operator T is constructed using a basis extension from U to V, confirming the validity of the counterexample.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically subspaces and linear operators.
  • Familiarity with the definition of invariant subspaces.
  • Knowledge of basis extension in vector spaces.
  • Ability to construct and analyze linear operators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of invariant subspaces in linear algebra.
  • Learn about the construction of linear operators and their effects on vector spaces.
  • Explore counterexamples in mathematical proofs to strengthen understanding of theorems.
  • Review the concepts of basis and dimension in vector spaces.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians interested in vector space theory, and anyone studying the properties of linear operators and invariant subspaces.

jimmypoopins
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove or give a counterexample: If U is a subspace of V that is invariant under every operator on V, then U = {0} or U = V.

Homework Equations


U is invariant under a linear operator T if u in U implies T(u) is in U.

The Attempt at a Solution


Assume {0} does not equal U does not equal V. Let {u1,...,un} be a basis for U. Extend to a basis for V: {u1,...,un,v1,...,vm}. Since V does not equal {0}, m is greater than or equal to 1. Define a linear operator by T=v1, i=1,...n and T(vi)=v1, i=1,...,m. Then U is not invariant under T.

I think this is a counterexample to the contrapositive of the statement. does it work? (the contrapositive is If U does not equal {0} does not equal V, then U is not invariant under every operator on V, right?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have the right idea, but your write up has some typos in it so I'm not sure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K