Inverse lorentz transformation question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem involving inverse Lorentz transformations in special relativity. The user successfully calculated the coordinates in frame S' but encountered discrepancies when applying the inverse transformation to find the original coordinates in frame S. They noted that while their time and spatial coordinates for y and z were accurate, their x-coordinate calculations were incorrect, leading to confusion over the rounding of values. The importance of maintaining precision in calculations, particularly for gamma and time, was emphasized, as it significantly affects the results. Ultimately, the user found that using more precise values resolved the discrepancies in their calculations.
Benzoate
Messages
418
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that an event occurs in inertial frame S with cooridinates x=75 m y=18 m ,z=4.0 m and t=2.0*10^-5 seconds . The inertial frame S' moves in the +x direction with v=c*.85 . The origins of S and S' coincided at t=t'=0. a)what are the coordinates of the event in S' and b) Use the inverse transformation on the results of part(a) to obtain the original coordinates

Homework Equations



x=gamma*(x'+vt') , t=gamma*(t'+v*x'/c^2) , t'=gamma*(t'-v*x'/c^2) , x'=gamma*(x-vt)
gamma=1/sqrt(1-B^2) ; B=v/c)

The Attempt at a Solution



I didn't have a problem calculating the coordinates in part a, but I will display my results from part a nevertheless

a) gamma =1/sqrt(1-(.85)^2= 1.9
y'=y=18 m
z'=z=4 m
x'=1.9*(75 m-(.85c)(2.0e-5 sec))=-9547.00 m
t'=1.9*(2.0e-5 - (.85c)(75)/(c^2))= .00004 secondsb) y=y'=18 m
z=z'= 4 m
x= 1.9*(-9547 m + (.85c)(.00004 sec)) = 1240.700
t=1.9*(.00004 seconds +(.85c)(-9547 m)/(c^2))= .00002

In part b,I don't understand why my calculations are incorrect for x , but not for t , z, or y
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not carrying enough decimal places... for t' and gamma you need more decimal places.
 
sorry, t is suppose to be equal to .00002 seconds, not .000002 seconds .gamma's actually value is 1.898 , but that still shouldn't effect the result of my other space coordinates if I round gamma to 1.9. no, t' is correct because when I plug t' into the equation for t, I get the correct result for t.
 
when I plug in t' = 3.759625*10^-5 into the inverse formula for x, I get back the correct x.
 
oh, so you didn't round t'?
 
Yeah, I didn't round... but seems I still wasn't accurate enough.

Also, I'm getting x = -9537.45... not x = -9547...

It seems to work out when x = -9537.45 and t = 3.75567*10^-5 s
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top