Ionic Bonding p.2: Na+¹ + O-² to Na2O?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jleposky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonding Ionic
AI Thread Summary
To understand how Na+¹ and O-² combine to form Na2O, it’s essential to recognize the charge balance required for ionic compounds. Sodium (Na) has a +1 charge, while oxygen (O) has a -2 charge, necessitating two sodium ions to balance one oxygen ion. This results in the formula Na2O, indicating two sodium ions for every one oxide ion. An analogy comparing sodium to pants and oxygen to shoes illustrates the need for a matching ratio in ionic bonding. The discussion emphasizes clarity in understanding charge ratios in ionic compounds.
jleposky
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I just made a thread on this but i did not understand the answer so I am asking for a simpler definition. How do I get from Na+¹ + O-² to Na2O??

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



no idea
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok, i understand it now, it was so easy but people had to confuse it.
 
Consider this example:
If you want your shoes to match with your pants...
and, you need to buy both of them. What would be ratio between the number of shoes and the number pants you bought.

In above question, oxygen are like shoes, and Na are like pants. Hopefully, you would be able to get a better analogy!

Edit: somehow, I missed your second post.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top