Ionisation chamber - doubt about current nature and residue

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the workings of an ionisation chamber, specifically focusing on the differences in electric current between the connecting wire and the air inside the chamber. In the wire, current is carried by electrons, while in the air, it involves both electrons and positively charged ions. When the α-source is removed, a potential difference of 0.2 V is still observed, attributed to background radiation causing ionisation and possibly leakage. The participant expresses uncertainty about the examiner's expectations regarding the reasons for non-zero current and questions the implications of the metal can's insulation. The conversation highlights the complexities of ionisation chambers and the factors influencing current flow.
catkin
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is from Advanced Physics by Adams and Allday, section 8, practice exam questions, question 25.

An α-source with an activity of 150 kBq is placed in a metal can. A 100 V d.c. source and a 109 Ώ resistor are connected in series to the can and the source. This arrangement is sometimes called an ionisation chamber.

b) Describe how the nature of the electric current in the connecting wire differs from that in the air in the can.

d) With the α-source removed from the metal can, the voltmeter still registers a potential difference of 0.2 V Suggest two reasons why the current is not zero.

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


b) Describe how the nature of the electric current in the connecting wire differs from that in the air in the can.
In the wire current is carried by electrons.
In the air current is carried by both electrons and positively charged ions.

I believe these answers are true but are they what the examiner was looking for?

d) With the α-source removed from the metal can, the voltmeter still registers a potential difference of 0.2 V Suggest two reasons why the current is not zero.

Background radiation creates some ionisation in the can.
Leakage?

I think "Background radiation" is a good answer but "Leakage" is weak. Is there something else the examiner might have been looking for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't follow this question at all. The can is made of metal. What is to stop the current flowing through the walls of the can?
 
Sorry - I do not know how to include the diagram. The diagram shows the -ve terminal of the battery connected via the resistor (with a voltmeter across it) to the source and the the +ve terminal of the battery connected to the can. The source is electrically insulated from the can.
 
Hello :smile:

It's taken a while ... here's the diagram that makes my original question make sense.

Best

Charles
 

Attachments

  • Figure 8.9.png
    Figure 8.9.png
    4.3 KB · Views: 448
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top