How Is Force Calculated to Move Connected Masses on a Frictional Surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tejas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irodov Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the minimum constant force F required to move two connected masses on a frictional surface, one must consider the frictional forces acting on each mass and the opposing spring force. The force F must overcome the frictional force on m2 and the spring force, which can lead to confusion about how F can be less than the total frictional forces. When m1 is negligible, the force needed to move m2 is effectively halved due to the spring's influence, which complicates the understanding of the dynamics involved. The work done by the applied force is divided between increasing the spring's potential energy and overcoming friction. This analysis clarifies that the effective force required changes based on the relative masses and the spring's properties.
tejas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
two masses, m1 and m2 are connected with an undeformed light spring and lie on a surface. the coefficents of friction between the masses and the surface are k1 and k2, respectively. What is the minimum constant force F, that needs to be applied in the horizontal direction to the m1, to shift the other mass?

http://irodovsolutionsmechanics.blogspot.com/2008_02_16_archive.html


here is the official solution to the problem, it's same as in Singh's book and the answer is also correct. But I simply cannot understand it. How can the force F be smaller than the sum of the sliding friction forces?

Also, if we take m1 to be negligable, then the force necessary would be the Frictional force on m2/2. How does that work out? Also, that would me that to move the m1 would be harder, if we applied the same force to m2. Help please, I'm puzzled :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forget the given solution.

Lets break the problem down. There are two blocks, each with the frictional force acting on it. On one block, we want to apply a force F, so we factor that into the FBD. At the same time, there is the spring force opposing the force F.

Now, the frictional force will be opposite to the direction of F, because it needs to oppose the force F. The spring force on the block m1 also opposes F.

The only forces on the block m2 are the frictional force and the spring force.

Now, let's say the block m1 moves a distance x. Now, lets, for the moment, assume that the block m2 is heavy enough that the spring must expand a little before the mass m2 moves.

Can you work through the equations up till this point?
 
well, the total force on m1 is F - kx- m1gk. the force on m2 is simply kx, until kx = m2gk.

anyways, now about the work. A = integral (Fdx) (sry I don't know how to post equations)

then A = Fx - kx^2/2 - m1gkx. is that zero? dunno. This is the work done on m1 by the sum of the forces on it. it must go somewhere. Where it goes? into -kx^2/2? as we take the kinetic energy zero.
 
anyone?
 
tejas said:
well, the total force on m1 is F - kx- m1gk. the force on m2 is simply kx, until kx = m2gk.

anyways, now about the work. A = integral (Fdx) (sry I don't know how to post equations)

then A = Fx - kx^2/2 - m1gkx. is that zero? dunno. This is the work done on m1 by the sum of the forces on it. it must go somewhere. Where it goes? into -kx^2/2? as we take the kinetic energy zero.
the work done by external force goes partly in increasing the elastic potential energy in spring and partly used up in overcoming friction. 'A' becomes 0 when x is the extreme position of the spring of max stretch
 
Ok I understand that, but how it solves the problem that only half of the frictional force is needed to move the m2 when m1 tends to 0?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top