Iron and Ice in Aluminum bucket of water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final temperature of a system consisting of an iron ball, an aluminum bucket, water, and ice. Initial calculations suggested a final temperature of 26.47 Celsius, but further analysis revealed that the heat exchange with the ice was not fully accounted for. The heat capacity of the combined system was calculated, leading to the conclusion that only a portion of the ice would melt due to insufficient heat available. Ultimately, it was determined that approximately 0.248 kg of ice would melt, with the remaining ice staying at 0 Celsius. The calculations were confirmed to be correct after addressing transcription errors.
LiorSh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Iron ball Mass = 0.8 kg, Cp=484, Ti=80 Celsius edit : Cp = 448
Aluminum Bucket = 0.5 kg, Cp=900, Ti=20 Celsius
Water = 0.6 kg, Cp=4186, Ti=20 Celsius
Ice cube=0.5 Kg, Cp=2090, Lf=3.33e5, Ti=-5 Celsius

Find the final temperature of the bucket.

Homework Equations


Delta Q = 0 in equilibrium

The Attempt at a Solution


At fist I took into consideration only the water,iron and Aluminum to find the temperature in equilibrium
Delta Q = 4186*0.6*(Tf-20)+900*0.5*(Tf-20)+448*0.8(Tf-80)=0
The final temperature I got is 26.47 Celsius

Next I calculate the amount of energy release from 0.6 kg of water = 600*4.182*26.47=66,482 J
Then I divided it by the amount of energy needed to bring this amount of water to 0 Celsius - 66,482/333=199.645 Grams of ice.
Since we have 0.5 kg of ice Tf will be equal to 0 Celsius and 0.3 Kg of the ice will remain in the bucket.

In order to proof it I wrote the following equation = Delta Q = 4186*0.6*(Tf-26.47)+2090*0.199*(0-(-5)) +0.199*3.33e5+4186*(0.199)*(Tf-0)=0

I got Tf= -0.65 Celsius which could be a result of roundoff error so it seems like I got the right answer.

But I think that I did something wrong since I ignored the Iron and the Aluminum in my last equation.

Thank you for your help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
LiorSh said:
Cp=484
LiorSh said:
448*0.8(Tf-80)=0
Try it again.
 
I think I wrote it by mistake - the given number is 448 for the Cp of the iron
 
LiorSh said:
the given number is 448 for the Cp
Okay. Transcription errors happen to all of us.
LiorSh said:
since I ignored the Iron and the Aluminum in my last equation.
What's the heat capacity of water + bucket + iron? That's the system you're cooling with the ice.
 
4.186*600g*26.47+0.450*800*26.47+0.900*500*26.47= 87880 The heat capacity of the system. Do I need to divide it by 333 now? then I get 263.905 grams of ice needed to bring the system to 0 Celsius.
 
LiorSh said:
Cp=2090, Lf=3.33e5, Ti=-5 Celsius
These numbers aren't just along for the ride.
LiorSh said:
Do I need to divide it by 333 now?
No. 3.33e5, or 3.33 x 105, or 330,000 comes in after one more step; the ice has in initial temperature less than that of the melting point.
 
Delta Q =(-87880+3320Tf)+(2090*0.500)*(0-(-5)) +0.500*3.33e5+4186*(0.500)*(Tf-0)=0 (The red part is from the first equation).
than I get -20 Celsius which is impossible.
There must be something I'm not aware of. What am I missing?
 
How much heat from bucket, water, and iron to raise the temperature of the ice to 0 C? How much does that lower the temperature of the bucket, water, and iron?
 
To raise the temperature of the ice to 0 we need 2.090 x 500 x 5 = 5225 J.
Bringing the Ice to 0 Celsius will lower the temp of the bucket by 1.6 Celsius ------> 87880-5225=3320Tf => 24.90 C

Is that correct?
Than Heat to melt the Ice = 3.33e5x0.5 = 166500 J
 
  • #10
Yes, and is there that much heat available in the bucket-water-iron?
 
  • #11
Nope, we have only 82655 left in the bucket
 
  • #12
And the final T is what?
 
  • #13
that means that we can use only 82655 of heat to melt the ice - which leaves us with 166500-82655= 83845
So it will melt 0.248 kg of the ice and the rest of the ice will remain in the bucket at 0 Celsius.

Is that correct? or there is a different way to prove it?
 
  • #14
I haven't checked all your arithmetic, but the only bug I've seen was the transcription error in the original post, so you should be good to go.
 
  • #15
It was a typo. In my notebook I used the right number. Thank you so much!
 
Back
Top