Irreducible representation of tensor field

su-ki
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In Mark Srednicki's book "Quantum Field Theory"
He says that a tensor field B^{αβ} with no particular symmetry can be written as :-

B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) Equn. 33.6

where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of B^{αβ} .

Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're talking about the general linear group GL(n), the irreducible representations are the tensors whose indices have been symmetrized in a particular way. When you go to the orthogonal group, there are fewer transformations in the group, and some of these representations are no longer irreducible. The operation of contraction (forming a trace) commutes with the orthogonal transformations.
 
su-ki said:
In Mark Srednicki's book "Quantum Field Theory"
He says that a tensor field B^{αβ} with no particular symmetry can be written as :-

B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) Equn. 33.6

where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of B^{αβ} .

Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.


This is true only if the symmetric part is traceless. In general, for any rank-2 tensor, we write
B^{ ab } = B^{ (ab) } + B^{ [ab] } .
Then we take the symmetric part and decompose it as
<br /> B^{ (ab) } = \left( B^{ (ab) } - \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B \right) + \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B .<br />
The tensor (call it S^{ ab }) in the bracket on the left-hand side is symmetric and traceless, because
B = \mbox{ Tr } ( B^{ (ab) } ) = g_{ ab } B^{ (ab) }
So, our original tensor can now be written as
<br /> B^{ ab } = A^{ ab } + S^{ ab } + \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B ,<br />
where A^{ ab } = - A^{ ba } \equiv B^{ [ab] }

See posts #24 and 25 in

www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=192572&page=2

Sam
 
yea, i got just it, thank u :)
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top