Irreducible representation of tensor field

Click For Summary
Mark Srednicki's "Quantum Field Theory" presents a decomposition of a tensor field B^{αβ} into antisymmetric, symmetric, and trace components. The explicit addition of the trace term T(x) is justified when the symmetric part is not traceless, allowing for a clearer representation of the tensor's structure. The decomposition highlights that for any rank-2 tensor, the symmetric part can be further split into a traceless component and a trace term. This approach is particularly relevant when considering transformations under the orthogonal group, where some representations may not remain irreducible. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding tensor decomposition in the context of symmetry and group theory.
su-ki
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In Mark Srednicki's book "Quantum Field Theory"
He says that a tensor field B^{αβ} with no particular symmetry can be written as :-

B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) Equn. 33.6

where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of B^{αβ} .

Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're talking about the general linear group GL(n), the irreducible representations are the tensors whose indices have been symmetrized in a particular way. When you go to the orthogonal group, there are fewer transformations in the group, and some of these representations are no longer irreducible. The operation of contraction (forming a trace) commutes with the orthogonal transformations.
 
su-ki said:
In Mark Srednicki's book "Quantum Field Theory"
He says that a tensor field B^{αβ} with no particular symmetry can be written as :-

B^{αβ} = A^{αβ} + S^{αβ} + (1/4) g^{αβ} T(x) Equn. 33.6

where A - Antisymmetric, S = symmetric and T(x) = trace of B^{αβ} .

Is there any reason for explicit addition of trace term ?
Coz generally we split things into symmetric and antisymmetric parts and trace is included in symmetric part.


This is true only if the symmetric part is traceless. In general, for any rank-2 tensor, we write
B^{ ab } = B^{ (ab) } + B^{ [ab] } .
Then we take the symmetric part and decompose it as
<br /> B^{ (ab) } = \left( B^{ (ab) } - \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B \right) + \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B .<br />
The tensor (call it S^{ ab }) in the bracket on the left-hand side is symmetric and traceless, because
B = \mbox{ Tr } ( B^{ (ab) } ) = g_{ ab } B^{ (ab) }
So, our original tensor can now be written as
<br /> B^{ ab } = A^{ ab } + S^{ ab } + \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } g^{ ab } B ,<br />
where A^{ ab } = - A^{ ba } \equiv B^{ [ab] }

See posts #24 and 25 in

www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=192572&page=2

Sam
 
yea, i got just it, thank u :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
716
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K