Is an Engineering Physics Major the Right Choice for Me?

AI Thread Summary
Engineering Physics is a versatile major that combines principles of physics with engineering, making it suitable for those interested in high-tech research and innovation. Graduates can pursue various career paths, including roles in research and development, aerospace, and technology sectors, often with competitive salaries. The major is perceived as challenging but rewarding, especially for those who enjoy math and physics. Schools like Rensselaer and Carnegie Mellon are recommended for this field, although applicants should consider their academic standings carefully. Overall, Engineering Physics is viewed as a strong choice for fostering creativity and adaptability in engineering careers.
C0mmie
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.
I'm applying to college right now, the Engineering Physics major has caught my eye. Can someone give me some info on this major, like is this a good major to pursue, and what career options are generally available, (and of course how much money you can make :smile: ). My original choice was mechanical/aerospace, but I sort of want to get into high tech research. I really love math and physics, so I don't think I'll have any trouble with it being more challenging than the other engineering majors (if that's the case).

Also, what are some good schools to study this major at? I live in the Boston area and am applying to Rensselaer and probably Carnegie Mellon, but my grades arent that great, and I will appreciate any advice on this matter(I just found out in October that I'll be graduating a year early from high school, so I'm a bit lost in the application process, and a bit stressed out)

Thanks a lot.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think its a good major. If you're clever, you can pick up any type of engineering very quickly with just basic physics knowledge. Learning physics will tend to be better for your long term creativity. A more focused engineering degree will teach you a lot of specific tools that or may not be useful to what you eventually end up doing.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top