Is Back EMF Always Equal to Battery EMF in Inductive Circuits?

AI Thread Summary
In inductive circuits, the back EMF generated by an inductor can equal the battery EMF under specific conditions, particularly when the circuit is ideal and resistance is negligible. The formula E = -L(dI/dt) indicates that the back EMF opposes the change in current, and during the transient phase, it can match the battery voltage. As the current increases, the rate of change (dI/dt) is constant, leading to a continuous increase in current without reaching a steady state due to the absence of resistance. Therefore, the assumption that back EMF equals battery EMF in this scenario is valid. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing inductive circuits accurately.
harsh95
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A coil of inductance 0.5 H is connected to a 18V battery. Calculate the rate of growth of current?

Homework Equations


E=-L(dI/dt)

The Attempt at a Solution


Actually I have the solution but the problem is that in the book they have assumed that the back emf that would develop due to increasing current would be the same as emf of the battery? i.e its written as dI/dt=E/L=18/0.5= 36 A/s
How is it possible? Or am I thinking wrong
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
harsh95 said:

Homework Statement


A coil of inductance 0.5 H is connected to a 18V battery. Calculate the rate of growth of current?

Homework Equations


E=-L(dI/dt)



The Attempt at a Solution


Actually I have the solution but the problem is that in the book they have assumed that the back emf that would develop due to increasing current would be the same as emf of the battery? i.e its written as dI/dt=E/L=18/0.5= 36 A/s
How is it possible? Or am I thinking wrong

The potential across the coil cannot be anything else but the same as that of the battery, assuming an ideal coil and battery. An ideal voltage source will produce ANY amount of current required to maintain its constant potential difference.
 
But I don't understand why the back emf generated by 18V i.e same as the battery.
We say that inductur has no resistance of itself. Then there is no potential drop when the current is steady
And when the current is changing then EMF is induced which is opposes the cause that produces it . And in the formula E=-LdI/dt, the E is the back emf right? And not the battery potential?
 
harsh95 said:
But I don't understand why the back emf generated by 18V i.e same as the battery.
We say that inductur has no resistance of itself. Then there is no potential drop when the current is steady
And when the current is changing then EMF is induced which is opposes the cause that produces it . And in the formula E=-LdI/dt, the E is the back emf right? And not the battery potential?

The current will definitely NOT be steady. There will be no steady state for this circuit since there's no resistance to limit the current.

Write the KVL loop equation for the circuit. Solve the resulting differential equation for the current. You'll see that the current increases without bound over time, but that dI/dt is a contant. Thus the back-emf is a constant, and it happens to equal the battery voltage.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top