Is Charge Density Zero for a Uniform E-field in y-direction?

AdkinsJr
Messages
148
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a function for an E-field E(x,y,z,t)=E_o\cos(k(x-ct))\hat j and I need to find the charge density...

Homework Equations



\vec \nabla \cdot\vec E=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_o}


The Attempt at a Solution




When I compute the dot product of gradient operator with the E-field I get zero since the only "term" in the factor is in the y direction, but it also does not have any variation with y so is the charge density in this region of space just zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AdkinsJr said:

Homework Statement


I have a function for an E-field E(x,y,z,t)=E_o\cos(k(x-ct))\hat j and I need to find the charge density...

Homework Equations



\vec \nabla \cdot\vec E=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_o}


The Attempt at a Solution




When I compute the dot product of gradient operator with the E-field I get zero since the only "term" in the factor is in the y direction, but it also does not have any variation with y so is the charge density in this region of space just zero?

I would agree with that.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top