Is Charging a 2.7V, 350F Supercapacitor with a 10mA, 20V Source Safe?

AI Thread Summary
Charging a 2.7V, 350F supercapacitor with a 20V source is potentially unsafe without proper voltage regulation. The initial suggestion of charging at 0.001mA would result in an impractically long charge time of nearly 30 years, making it ineffective. A potential divider can be used to reduce the voltage to a safe level, such as 2.2V, allowing for safer charging. However, there are concerns about leakage current and the actual current rating, which was initially misstated as 10mV but later clarified to be 10mA. Proper precautions and equipment are essential to ensure safe charging of the supercapacitor.
cosmos1226
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have supercapcitor 2.7V, 350F. I want to charge it by 0.001mA 20V power source. Is it safe?
Thanks you!.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi
welcome to the forums

well its a 2.7V capacitor ... what do you think ?

Dave
 
cosmos1226 said:
I have supercapcitor 2.7V, 350F. I want to charge it by 0.001mA 20V power source. Is it safe?
Thanks you!.
What arrangement will you use to charge it? How do you know your power supply is limited to 0.001mA?
 
A 350 F capacitor charged to 2.7 volt contains a charge of 2.7*350 = 945 Coulombs.
If the current is really limited to 0.001mA, it would take 945 / (10^-6) = 9.45 * 10^8 seconds = 29.9 years for it to charge to 2.7 volts, so you'd be ok for a long time.
In practice there will be a lot more leakage current than 0.001 mA and the capacitor would never charge to 2.7 volt.
 
I'm experimenting power supply 20V for charging 27V capacitor 350F. Supercapacitor is loaded, but does know it safe?
 
cosmos1226 said:
I'm experimenting power supply 20V for charging 27V capacitor 350F. Supercapacitor is loaded, but does know it safe?
Is the capacitor rating 2.7V or 27V?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Is the capacitor rating 2.7V or 27V?
. maxwell supercapacitor 2.7V 350F. thánks you
 
You could connect a pair of resistors as a potential divider to reduce your 20V down to a safe level, say 2.2V. Then the supercapacitor could be safely left to charge unsupervised, and you'd know that in a few decades it should be almost fully charged to 2.2V

You haven't answered why you want to charge it at 0.001mA, and I presume that is not the figure you intend.
 
  • Like
Likes cosmos1226
NascentOxygen said:
You could connect a pair of resistors as a potential divider to reduce your 20V down to a safe level, say 2.2V. Then the supercapacitor could be safely left to charge unsupervised, and you'd know that in a few decades it should be almost fully charged to 2.2V

You haven't answered why you want to charge it at 0.001mA, and I presume that is not the figure you intend.
Although the voltage is 20V but only amperage 10mV (it as a leak). so, I do not want to pass any parts change any power consuming.
 
  • #10
cosmos1226 said:
amperage 10mV
10mV is not a current

In theory, you could connect a parallel 2.2V zener diode to limit the capacitor's voltage at 2.2V, but a practical zener would have significant leakage current below a capacitor voltage of 2.2V.
 
  • Like
Likes cosmos1226
  • #11
NascentOxygen said:
10mV is not a current

In theory, you could connect a parallel 2.2V zener diode to limit the capacitor's voltage at 2.2V, but a practical zener would have significant leakage current below a capacitor voltage of 2.2V.
I'm sorry, 10mA
 
  • #12
cosmos1226 said:
I'm sorry, 10mA
So it's 10mA now!

Up until this, it has been one-thousandth of a milliamp (0.001mA).

Are you sure it's 10mA??
 
Back
Top