Is e^(ikx)/(x^2+a^2) Integrateable over All Reals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ashley1nOnly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
AI Thread Summary
The function e^(ikx)/(x^2+a^2) is being analyzed for its integrability over all reals. A participant questions whether the function is odd, suggesting it should integrate to zero, but it is clarified that the function is neither even nor odd due to differing parities in its real and imaginary components. The user is seeking resources or references to assist with the integration process, as their attempts, including integration by parts, have not been successful. The discussion emphasizes the need for proper understanding of the function's properties before proceeding with integration. Overall, the focus is on finding effective methods for integrating this complex function.
Ashley1nOnly
Messages
132
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


(e^(ikx)/(x^2+a^2))dx (-infinity, +infinitiy)

Isn't this function odd so it should be zero?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to complete the entire problem but I'm having troubles integrating this. I'm looking for someone to reference ( a website or an equation ) where I could learn how to properly integrate this function.
Please don't solve.
Integration by parts didn't work.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think integration by parts works. How about showing what you did and what didn't work?
 
Ashley1nOnly said:

Homework Statement


(e^(ikx)/(x^2+a^2))dx (-infinity, +infinitiy)

Isn't this function odd so it should be zero?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know how to complete the entire problem but I'm having troubles integrating this. I'm looking for someone to reference ( a website or an equation ) where I could learn how to properly integrate this function.
Please don't solve.
Integration by parts didn't work.
It is neither even nor odd: the real and imaginary parts have different parity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top