Is Electric Current a Scalar, Vector, or Constrained Vector?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of electric current as a scalar, vector, or constrained vector. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these classifications in various contexts, including electrical circuits and phasor representation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that electric current is neither strictly a scalar nor a vector, proposing it may be a constrained vector due to its directional characteristics in certain contexts.
  • Others argue that electric current is fundamentally a scalar, citing that it is typically not represented in vector notation and is added algebraically in circuit analysis.
  • A participant mentions that while current in a standard electrical circuit is a scalar, the direction of current can be relevant in specific scenarios, such as when considering the effects of magnetic fields.
  • There is a discussion about the representation of AC current as phasors, which some view as vectors in an abstract space, raising the question of whether current can be modeled as a vector in useful contexts.
  • Another participant points out that current density is a vector, while the total current is a scalar derived from it, suggesting a distinction between the two concepts.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the validity of references used to support claims, questioning the reliability of sources cited in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on whether electric current should be classified as a scalar, vector, or constrained vector. Multiple competing views remain, with some arguing for scalar classification and others proposing a more nuanced understanding.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining electric current, with participants acknowledging that context matters in determining how current is modeled or understood. There are references to specific scenarios, such as AC circuits and magnetic fields, which may influence interpretations.

debajyoti datta
Messages
35
Reaction score
3
what is electric current...a scaler or vector?? ...well I personally believe that it is somewhere in between the two extremes (what is not 0,need not be an 1 either :oldbiggrin: ) ...particularly because of the strange similarity we see in vector addition and phasor addition)...some people call it a constrained vector...let us discuss
 
Physics news on Phys.org
debajyoti datta said:
what is electric current...a scaler or vector??

electric current is defined as time rate of flow of charge -so naturally it has a direction and a magnitude .
some phenomena depend on the direction of current - in electrical circuits the flow is restricted so the vectror takes a circulatory turn /some people may be calling it constrained to move in a particular way- charges can move due to field effect and the current element has a definite direction
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: debajyoti datta
Drakkith said:
As far as I know, current in a standard electrical circuit is a scalar. You don't ever see current described in vector
you are very much correct.
well i was referring to the direction of current in terms of motion of charges - may not be in electrical circuits .
for example if we take the effect on current element in a magnetic field or the circulatory charges leading to current - there we take the current in a definite spatial direction- /calculation of force on a current carrying conductor.
in those cases we take the vector product of current element with magnetic field vector..
 
And when AC current is represented as a phasor?
This is a vector in an abstract 2D space, but whether that counts ...?
Perhaps we should not be saying, "Is current a vector?", rather, "Can current usefully be modeled by a vector?" After all, that's what a vector is, a mathematical abstraction. The world is not full of little arrows - they're just in our minds and on our diagrams.

Edit: & just going back to OP, "What is electric current...a scaler or vector?" Is that a real question? Should it not be, "Can we (usefully) model electric current as a scalar or a vector, in some particular context."
It is like my pet hate - is light a particle or a wave? No, light is light. Sometimes it is useful to use a wave model, sometimes a particle model, but light isn't a model. Even if people cleverer than me know a model that fits all known situations for light, then it is still a model that we can use to make predictions about what real light actually does.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: debajyoti datta
1st of all I am not saying that current is a vector, but I am arguing that it is not a scaler also...phasors are added just like vectors...and the reference for them is intial phase=0...now...direction is always w.r.t the reference co-ordinate system you choose according to your convenience...and your reference will give you the result which you want...nothing is absolute in this world...as per as calculation is concerned in pen-paper, directions can come from chosen reference... can't we think phase as a metaphor for direction while dealing with phasors? ... in that sense,I opine that current falls somewhere in between scaler and vector.
 
debajyoti datta said:
I opine that current falls somewhere in between scaler and vector.
Do you have a reference which shares this opinion?
 
As far as I know, current is a scalar. In KCL, we add currents algebrically at a node. In case of ac circuits, phasors are rms values.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/cTRommP4ZE43NDXHNxeM5dJ1LBBJCPaUXfx-s63iEVycNbLpnAyHA94ZLF8tVo4p2NHANLkrQ6N05WU5xoRUDuLNAfDoaxPeie4lkj0nXc1t=w399-h241-nc
Here, Is will be phasor addition of IR, IL and Ic and they're all rms values. But if we consider instantaneous values, they can be added algebraically. We can choose the sign of current depending on wheather it is entering or leaving the node, but we can add the currents algebraically. For magnetic circuits, direction of current determines the magnetic flux direction and magnetic polarity but that's all. I haven't seen components of current like components of vectors in different directions.
 
Dale said:
Do you have a reference which shares this opinion?
I googled "is current scalar,vector or constrained vector"...and went on the first facebook link
 
  • #10
debajyoti datta said:
and went on the first facebook link

And you think this is a valid reference?
 
  • #11
The current density at a point inside a conductor is a vector, ##\vec J##.

The current in a wire is the surface integral of ##\vec J## over a cross section of the wire, which is a scalar, I: $$I = \int {\vec J \cdot d \vec a}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Dale and cnh1995
  • #12
debajyoti datta said:
I googled "is current scalar,vector or constrained vector"...and went on the first facebook link
Please review the forum rules regarding acceptable references on PF.

The post by jtbell completely answers the question. Current density is a vector, current is a scalar.

Since the question is answered and since there are no relevant references regarding anything "in between", this thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K