B Is F = -mg a mistake in orbital mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The expression F = -mg is not a mistake but rather depends on the chosen coordinate system and sign convention. In physics, the direction of forces can be defined arbitrarily, meaning that if upward is considered positive, then F = -mg is correct, while if downward is positive, F = mg applies. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding vector versus scalar quantities, as this can influence the appropriate sign in equations. It is crucial to consider the context and assumptions made by the author when interpreting these equations. Ultimately, clarity in defining directions and forces is key in orbital mechanics.
Philip Robotic
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!

I'm really sorry if I'm using the wrong forum. It's my first time at PF.

I'm pretty new to physics, as I began studying it just two years ago, but I'm really interested in the subject of astrophysics so I bought myself and started reading 'Introduction to rocket science and engineering' by Travis S. Taylor. So far I'm really enjoying it, but at the beginning of orbital mechanics, where the author also shows the basic dynamic equations related to gravity.

And the third one looks weird. It says: F = -mg

And as far as I know, it should look like this: F = mg

Is this a mistake in my book, or there's a specific case in which the F = -mg can be used?

Ps. If I'm using the wrong forum, tell me and I'll copy and delete the thread here and post it on the right one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Gravity makes massive objects attract each other. The planet attracts the satellite. The force pulls the satellite toward the planet. But the sign about whether a force in that direction is plus or minus is an arbitrary choice.

Does that answer your question?
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Robotic
The correct expression is ##\Sigma f=ma##. If they are assuming there is a single external force then ##\Sigma f=f## and if they are further assuming that ##a=-g## then you would get ##f=-mg##

As @anorlunda says, look at the direction of the force and at the direction of the coordinate system to see if the ##a=-g## assumption makes sense.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Robotic
Different textbooks can use different coordinate systems, sign conventions and systems of units, which can affect the form of equations. You have to be aware of the context that the author is working in.

Another detail that students often overlook is whether a quantity in an equation is a scalar (usually italic like ##g##) or a vector (sometimes boldface ##\mathbf{g}## or with an arrow on top ##\vec g## or maybe something else), which can affect which sign is appropriate.
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Robotic
Wow, I didn't expect such a quick reply! Thank you very much for explaining! :smile:
 
If upward (pointing) force is defined as positive, then F = -mg. If downward (pointing) force is defined as positive, then F = + mg. So it depends on whether F is defined as positive upwards or positive downwards. If you describe the force vectorially using unit vectors, you can never go wrong. ##\vec{F}=mg(-\vec{i}_z)##, where ##\vec{i}_z## is the unit vector in the upward (z) direction.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and rikblok
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top