Is General Relativity Based on General Relativity or Equivalence?

eVulcanon
Is the general theory of relativity based on the principle of general relativity?or the principle of equivalence, or both of them? And if both of them, which one is more important? Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eVulcanon said:
Is the general theory of relativity based on the principle of general relativity?

Um. Not sure about that bit, however, the equivalence principle - that in any sufficiently small reason a gravitational field is indistinguishable from acceleration - is pretty fundamental.

Here, the "sufficiently small region" takes care of eliminating the tidal forces that would allow you to distinguish the field from (linear) acceleration.
 
I don't know about any "principle of general relativity" other than the principle of equivalence...

...unless you're thinking about the principle of relativity, which underlies special relativity: that physical laws are the same in all inertial reference frames.
 
thank u guys!
 
The "General" refers to the principle of general covariance. From Wikipedia:
Wiki said:
The essential idea is that coordinates do not exist a priori in nature, but are only artifices used in describing nature, and hence should play no role in the formulation of fundamental physical laws.
That's an extension to special relativity, where physical laws look the same only in a special subset of coordinate systems - inertial frames.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top