Is Gravity Capable of Repulsive Forces?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept that gravity may not be a force in the traditional sense, as it lacks opposite charges like electricity. A recent article on dark matter highlights ongoing challenges in locating it, raising skepticism about its existence. The idea is proposed that the observed expansion of the universe might be explained by a repulsive aspect of gravity rather than dark matter. However, the notion of an "opposite charged graviton" poses challenges for understanding how matter would coalesce. The conversation invites speculation on these unconventional theories within the scientific community.
Yohan_Borga
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Greetings,

When I was still in college, a professor commented that it was possible that gravity was not a force. He based this on the observation that gravity didn’t seem to have opposite charges. The force of electricity has positive and negative. Gravity does not seem to have such attractive and repulsive properties.
In shashdot, a story titled “Missing Matter… Still Missing” has appeared. It seems that the latest attempt to locate dark matter failed. This doesn’t surprise me because I’ve always had a problem with the theory of “dark” matter and energy. It just doesn’t seem right.
I am wondering if what we observe in cosmology could be the result of gravity’s “opposite” charge of repulsion. Could the vast voids and expansion be accounted for by the repulsive charge of gravity? I’m not a physicist or cosmologist but I am hoping the learned community may speculate on this possibility. How about it folks?

:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whatever is causing the accelerated expansion of the universe does act somewhat like gravitic repulsion, but it is not associated with matter, but rather distributed through empty space. This would make problems for a theory of an "opposite charged graviton" I think.
 
selfAdjoint said:
Whatever is causing the accelerated expansion of the universe does act somewhat like gravitic repulsion, but it is not associated with matter, but rather distributed through empty space. This would make problems for a theory of an "opposite charged graviton" I think.

If opposite charged gravitons exist, how would matter come together?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top