Is hybridization the result of electron promotion?

AI Thread Summary
Hybridization is fundamentally a mathematical concept involving the combination of orbitals of similar energies to form new orbitals. While it is suggested that electron promotion is related to hybridization, it is not a strict requirement for the process to occur. An example was presented that demonstrates hybridization can happen without electron promotion. This indicates that while promotion may facilitate hybridization, it is not essential for it to take place. Overall, the relationship between electron promotion and hybridization is complex and not fully dependent on promotion.
mcfaker
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I wonder if hybridization occurs due to the promotion of electrons?

If the promotion would not occur, neither would hybridization?


Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At its base, hybridization is a mathematical construction, where linear combinations of orbitals (of similar energies) are use to create new orbitals.

From the point of view of electrons, as it involves orbitals with different values of l, thus of different energy, it is in a sense related to the promotion of electrons.

So yes, I would say that hybridization requires promotion. But remember that it is just an approximation, based single-electron orbitals, neglecting electron-electron interactions.
 
Hi, acutally I came to the conclusion that my previous statement might not be true afterall, because I found the following example in which no promotion occurs and still hybridization takes place:

3579e5826a734e9ffb62f21ba8eb1a19.png


Does this mean promotion does not have to occur for hybridization?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top