Is it OK to write the resistance in parallel like this?

Click For Summary
Writing the equation for resistance in parallel is acceptable, and the method of using the reciprocal of the sum of the reciprocals is a common mnemonic. Pocket calculators simplify this process significantly compared to slide rules. It is important to ensure that the total resistance in a parallel network is always less than the smallest resistor present. The same formula for calculating total resistance can also be applied to inductors, while capacitors require a different approach. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the practicality and elegance of the parallel resistance formula.
TBert
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am creating an equations sheet for electronics forumlas and am wondering if it is OK to write the equation for resistance in parallel like this:
33bnUFo.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
TBert said:
I am creating an equations sheet for electronics forumlas and am wondering if it is OK to write the equation for resistance in parallel like this: View attachment 197492
Yes.
 
My memory rhyme was always "Reciprocal of the sum of the reciprocals"
which when pocket calculators came along in 1970's became quite handy.

Enter R,, press 1/x, press M+, repeat until all R's accounted for, press Recall Memory, press 1/x .

That's one place where a pocket calculator really outdoes a slide rule .

Your formula is much more elegant. Just make sure there's not a R0 !

have fun,.

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes Electron Spin
A bit off track but in // r's the total network R should always be smaller than the smallest resistor in ohms.

Also, a network has no P/S whereas a circuit has a power supply.

And again what Jimbo said... R total = the sum of the reciprocals, reciprocated. You can use the same formula for inductors as well, whereas capacitors you treat opposite.
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...