Is it possible that white people are genetically older than

  • Thread starter thankz
  • Start date
In summary, white people are genetically older than black people. This is based on genetic evidence from humans further away from Africa.
  • #1
thankz
265
40
is it possible that white people are genetically older than black people?

I visited the natural sciences museum in dc and saw a mural of what was supposed to be the first man and they were black. now I'm wondering were white people a product of evolution or is it because white people migrated away from Africa? if we evolved from primates why are some small monkeys born with pink skin? I've also noticed this in cats too. in the monkeys case the loss of melatonin isn't because they moved to a colder climate and needed the vitamin d?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Current consensus is that white skin evolved as human populations migrated into more northern latitudes. In these areas decreased light levels lead to an increase in vitamin D deficiency. Thus there was a selective pressure for less melanin in skin in order to absorb UV light.
 
  • #3
this doesn't explain the monkeys, cats and pigs though which all predate us?
 
  • #4
Monkeys, cats and pigs do not predate on us. The nice thing about being human is that we're apex predators; nothing predates on us. I don't know why they're born pink but clearly many animals either manage to get enough UV through their fur or synthesis it another way.
 
  • #5
your right, their the same age as in terms of evolving from protozoa but when they forked on the tree they have become almost perfected in terms of purpose, maybe we have too but that is debatable.
 
  • #6
thankz said:
predate
I think the OP intends "predate" to mean "occurring/appearing earlier than humans."
 
  • #7
yes that is what I meant.
 
  • #8
Ah apologies. In which case my answer still stands, animals cover their skin with fur/feathers/hair which limit UV light going in. This would create selective pressure for light skin. Interestingly it seems this is still somewhat of an open question. This paper:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20412916

Looked into whether or not cows synthesised vitamin D in oily secretions (theorised in other animals) in the fur but can't find evidence of it.
 
  • #9
it's hard to imagine a cat would even be able to absorb any uv through the hair. look at these pictures:
acre-cat.jpg

cat%2Bwallpaper%2B1.jpg


any explanation on why the gums, paws and nose are opposite colors?
 
  • #10
The mechanism for the synthesis of vitamin D3 in land mammals is not completely understood, as can be seen in this abstract:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20412916

It is known that land mammals do synthesize some of this vitamin by exposure to sunlight, and the rest may come from food which the animal consumes.

It is possible that sufficient amounts of the vitamin are generated by exposure of oils on the fur to sunlight, which oil the animal then ingests during grooming.

http://www.news-medical.net/health/Vitamin-D-Biochemistry.aspx
 
  • #11
I read the ingredients of meow mix, they add d3, can this be the only source of d3 or do they need uv light to synthase besides that? that is my last question, the rest I will learn in time.
 
  • #12
thankz said:
I read the ingredients of meow mix, they add d3, can this be the only source of d3 or do they need uv light to synthase besides that? that is my last question, the rest I will learn in time.
Cats are well known for grooming their fur constantly. If they are exposed to sunlight (i.e., not a strictly inside cat), they should synthesize some D3 if it comes from the oils on the fur. Being obligate carnivores, their diet may contain sufficient D3 to remain healthy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnivore
 
  • #13
thanks much, :smile:
 
  • #14
thankz said:
is it possible that white people are genetically older than black people?
As has been pointed out, this is actually backwards. I remember reading about this many years ago, so it's not some new discovery.
 
  • #15
post a link please.
 
  • #16
thankz said:
post a link please.
As I said, it was some years ago and I don't even remember where I read it. You can disbelieve what we are telling you if you like but if you are really interested I would think a modest amount of research on your part would turn up confirming evidence.
 
  • #17
will do, I plan to look at the genome.
 
  • #18
Well, firstly, all humans originated in Africa; there's some contention about when, why, and how, but it's generally agreed that all humans originated from Africa.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16826514

Secondly, as you sample DNA from humans further away from Africa, you get more bits of DNA from our cousins (like Neanderthals) showing up in human DNA, whereas Africa has more "pure" homosapiens. The neanderthals were already in Europe and the Middle East when homo sapiens migrated through those regions, and some cross-breeding occurred:

http://www.sciencemag.org/site/special/neandertal/feature/index.html
Human-cousins.jpg
\\

Of course, people of all races born today didn't precede each other by anymore than the the difference in their birthdates, but as far as evolutionary history, all humans of all skin colors essentially descended from dark-skinned humans (and neanderthals to a limited degree). So you could say that Africa's ancestors are the ancestors of all ancestors :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
  • #19
so did the evolutionary tree split from the primates being on connected continents then splitting or was it later than that?
 
  • #20
Ryan_m_b said:
Ah apologies. In which case my answer still stands, animals cover their skin with fur/feathers/hair which limit UV light going in. This would create selective pressure for light skin. Interestingly it seems this is still somewhat of an open question. This paper:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20412916

Looked into whether or not cows synthesised vitamin D in oily secretions (theorised in other animals) in the fur but can't find evidence of it.

Since all or most land animals have light skin, AFAIK, wouldn't there be a also a selective pressure for an animal with no fur covering to have a darker skin for UV protection. But darker skin should have an energy demand through the production of protection, which with a lighter skin the animal does not have.
Lighter skin should have the advantage over dark, at times when energy input supplies are limited.
Woman, for example, have usually of a lighter skin tone than males, and could not the "feeding for 2" have something to do with that.
Has there ever been any investigations on the energy demand of skin color and fitness.
 
  • #21
thankz said:
is it possible that white people are genetically older than black people?

No. Our best evidence is that humans originated in the rift valley, and from there migrated to the middle east where the population drift bifurcated form there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_African_Rift

Watch this guy, he's cool:

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/journey-man-genetic-odyssey/
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
  • #22
There are differences between animals in their ability to synthesize vitamins (or not) and their requirements. Species can lose the ability to synthesize certain compounds, if they can easily get them from their food. At that point there will be no need to maintain the gene. Meat in general is a very good source of all sorts of vitamins. Also gut bacteria might produce certain vitamins. Humans have probably lost more such genes than most species, because we are omnivores.

And I don't know the exact mechanics of skin color, but isn't it just a quantitative difference in melatonin production? Such traits can evolve extremely rapidly (in both directions) and revert easily, since at no point does loss of the mechanism itself occur. Just a difference in degree of expression.

Anyway, it would be best talk about the trait of a certain skin color, rather than 'white/black people'. And not 'perfected' species either, since every species is well adapted to its environment, but at the same time environment generally undergo continues change. At best you say that the feline body plan is very common (having evolved in multiple lineages), so it's probably just very efficient for predators to look like that.
 
  • #23
I'm sure that I get things wrong sometimes and I don't mind it when people point that out. I'll be the first to admit that I don't exactly post with citations and references...

However, I do mind when someone tell me I'm wrong, but doesn't even take the effort to point out what he doesn't agree with. Then you are just being rude. If you want to discuss something specific I'll reply but otherwise I'll leave it at this.
 
  • Like
Likes Pythagorean
  • #24
Just for the record,

Melatonin
Melatonin, chemically N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine,[1] is a substance found in animals, plants, fungi and bacteria. In animals it is a hormone that anticipates the daily onset of darkness;[2] however in other organisms it may have different functions. Likewise, the synthesis of melatonin in animals differs from that in other organisms.
...
In vertebrates, melatonin is produced in darkness, thus usually at night, by the pineal gland, a small endocrine gland[31] located in the center of the brain but outside the blood–brain barrier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melatonin

melanin
Melanin (Greek: μέλας - melas, "black, dark") is a broad term for a group of natural pigments found in most organisms (arachnids are one of the few groups in which it has not been detected). Melanin is produced by the oxidation of the amino acid tyrosine, followed by polymerization. The pigment is produced in a specialized group of cells known as melanocytes.

There are three basic types of melanin: eumelanin, pheomelanin, and neuromelanin. The most common type of melanin is eumelanin. There are two types of eumelanin—brown eumelanin and black eumelanin. Pheomelanin is a cysteine-containing red polymer of benzothiazine units largely responsible for red hair, among other pigmentation. Neuromelanin is found in the brain, though its function remains obscure.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melanin

And, it might be worthwhile mentioning,
Melamine
Melamine is an organic base and a trimer of cyanamide, with a 1,3,5-triazine skeleton. Like cyanamide, it contains 67% nitrogen by mass and, if mixed with resins, has fire retardant properties due to its release of nitrogen gas when burned or charred, and has several other industrial uses. Melamine is also a metabolite of cyromazine, a pesticide. It is formed in the body of mammals that have ingested cyromazine.[2] It has been reported that cyromazine can also be converted to melamine in plants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melamine
 
  • #25
Ahh yes mixed the names up. Yesterday I wanted to buy some (melatonin pills that is), but the government here has lowered the allowed amount that can be sold legally (100x less than it was before), so I suppose I'll go to sleep without it (although I was never quite certain if it actually did anything or was just a placebo). I guess the word was on my mind in any case.
 
  • #26
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 

Is it possible that white people are genetically older than other races?

There is no scientific evidence to support the notion that one race is genetically older than another. The concept of race itself is a social construct, and genetic differences between races are minimal. Additionally, human genetic diversity is constantly evolving and changing, making it difficult to determine a definitive age for any particular race.

What factors contribute to the perceived age of different races?

The perceived age of different races is largely influenced by societal and cultural beliefs, rather than genetics. Historical events, such as colonization and slavery, have also played a role in shaping the perceived age of different races. Additionally, environmental factors, such as diet and lifestyle, can impact physical characteristics and contribute to the perceived age of a race.

Could genetic testing determine the age of different races?

No, genetic testing cannot determine the age of different races. While DNA analysis can reveal information about an individual's ancestry and genetic makeup, it cannot accurately determine the age of a race. Genetic testing is also not a reliable method for determining racial characteristics, as genetic variations can exist within and between racial groups.

What can we learn from studying human genetic diversity?

Studying human genetic diversity can provide valuable insights into our evolutionary history and the migration patterns of our ancestors. It can also help us better understand the genetic basis of certain diseases and how they may vary among different populations. Additionally, examining genetic diversity can shed light on the relationships between different human populations and help promote inclusivity and understanding among different races.

How does the concept of race impact scientific research?

The concept of race has been used in scientific research for many years, but it is important to recognize that it is a social construct rather than a biological reality. The use of racial categories in research can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and overlook important genetic variations within and between races. It is crucial for scientists to critically evaluate and address the impact of race on their research methods and results.

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
64
Views
7K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Back
Top