Is it possible to bring back dead organisms to life using DNA?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hivesaeed4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna Life
AI Thread Summary
The possibility of bringing back an extinct species from a perfectly preserved genome, such as one found in amber, faces significant challenges. Current cloning efforts, like those aimed at woolly mammoths, rely on using a closely related extant species as a surrogate due to the lack of methods for transferring essential epigenetic information. Environmental changes since the species' extinction pose additional risks, as gene expression is heavily influenced by surroundings. An embryo developed in today's conditions may suffer from deformities or behavioral issues, as it would not experience the same environmental factors that shaped its ancestors. Therefore, even with a complete genome, recreating the original organism's appearance and behavior remains highly problematic.
hivesaeed4
Messages
217
Reaction score
0
Suppose we found a perfectly preserved genome of an extinct species (maybe in a amber). Would it be possible to bring back the organism to life. (I know this question resembles Jurassic Park but I'm looking for realistic answers).

Like let's say a mosquito or some other blood sucking organism sucked the blood of an extinct species and then got preserved in amber. Now if that piece of amber was found and the extinct species DNA was extracted would it be possible to bring back that species to life?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
At present, IIRC, there's no process for transferring essential epigenetic info. That's why, IIRC, the Japanese team who want to 'clone' woolly mammoths plan to use the nearest extant relative, an elephant, as host mother, hoping for sufficient commonality.
 
The biggest problem I see to cloning a long extinct animal is that the environment has likely changed much since it was around. People often forget that gene expression is influenced greatly by environmental factors. A tricertops embryo that develops in the modern world might grow to be deformed, have mental or behavioral problems, might not be able to breath, could have problems with overheating, or even it's enzymes or other biochemical structures might not work the way they're supposed to. Even given the genome, you'd have to try to perfectly replicate the environment that the creature developed and lived in if you wanted it to look and act the way it did in the past. Given that some behaviors are learned and passed on, you wouldn't be able to do that.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top