Is My Lie Algebra 4D or 5D Given These Structure Constants?

bartadam
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I have five generators of a lie algebra, g_1,g_2,g_3,g_4,g_5 which at first glance I believe are independent, although I could be wrong.

I have calculated the structure constants, i.e.

\left[g_i,g_j\right]=f_{ij}^k g_k

And from that I have calculated a matrix rep using \left(T_i\right)_j^k=f_{ij}^k

I get T_1, T_2, T_3, T_4 all linearly independent.

However I get T_4=-T_5 which I do not understand. Does this mean there algebra is only 4D rather than 5D?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi again, I could really use some help on this please.

I have also realized T1+T2+T3=0.

I do not understand. Does this mean g1+g2+g3=0. I do not believe this at all.
 
The dimension of a lie algebra depends on the representation you choose for it.
Recall that a representation is a map d:L(G)\to M(V), where L(G) is the lie algebra of some lie group G and M(V) is the space of linear transformations V\to V (V=\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{C}).

So, for example, you could have what is called the trivial representation where d(g)=0 for all g\in L(G), which is one dimensional, even though your algebra could has more than one element.

Another example is the fundamental representation, where d(g)=g for all g\in L(G). Here the dimension of the lie algebra is equal to the number of elements in the algebra (called the rank of the algebra).

In the example that you state, where the matrix representation equals the structure constants, is called the adjoint representation. I would guess, from the information that you give, that that representation is 3 dimensional, as you have 2 constraints over 5 five "variables".
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top