Is My Wave Equation Correct for These Parameters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rugapark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Writing
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the formulation of a wave equation based on specified parameters, including amplitude, wave vector, angular frequency, and time. Participants are examining the correctness of the equation derived from these parameters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the general wave equation and its components, questioning the meaning and units of the wave vector, and exploring the implications of setting time to zero in the equation.

Discussion Status

There is an active exploration of the wave equation's components, with some participants providing clarifications and hints regarding the dimensionality of the sine function's argument and the implications of the time variable. Multiple interpretations of the wave vector and its units are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and units associated with wave parameters, particularly focusing on the distinction between angular frequency and frequency, as well as the implications of using specific values in the wave equation.

rugapark
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I needed to write an equation for a wave with:

amplitude : 2cm
wave vector : 502.7
angular frequency : 125.7 Hz
time : 0 sec

and I used the general equation for waves to come up with:

y = 0.02 sin (125.7 - 502.7x)

is that alright?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the general equation you used (and what do the constants mean)?

Also, what do you mean by: wave vector = some number ?
 
y=A sin (wt\pmkx) is the formula where

A = amplitude
w = angular freq.
t = time
k = wave vector

wave vector doesn't have units as it's a vector quantity.. right?
 
rugapark said:
wave vector doesn't have units as it's a vector quantity.. right?

You might want to reconsider this statement. Displacement is a vector quantity, would you agree that displacement has a unit?

One hint - the argument of the Sine function must be dimensionless.

I agree with your general equation. However, using the conditions you gave (t=0) are you sure that you're happy with the time component of the argument? Remember your multiplying the angular velocity and time, with the time equal to zero. Are you sure this would give you the angular velocity back, like your expression suggests?

Kind Regards

Barny
 
What's given for frequency is Hz, usually represented by f. The radian frequency, w, is w=2*pi*f. However, the wave equation has w*t. If t is zero, then that product is zero, and there is no need to convert.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K