Is nuclear decay based on probability?

Chaste
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
as above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what do you mean with "based"?

A nucleus has a certain probability to decay witihin each small time inverval yes. Why do you ask?
 
malawi_glenn said:
what do you mean with "based"?

A nucleus has a certain probability to decay witihin each small time inverval yes. Why do you ask?

Does it apply only for alpha decay? or Beta and gamma decays too?
 
Yes!
 
malawi_glenn said:
Yes!

alright thank you =)
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top