Calculators Is Paying for Anti-Virus Software Worth It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Software
AI Thread Summary
The latest Consumer Reports issue evaluates both free and paid anti-virus software, revealing no significant performance differences between the top free options—Avira, AVG, Avast, and Microsoft Security Essentials—and the leading paid programs. Paid software primarily offers comprehensive packages that include firewall and anti-spam features, but since free alternatives for these functions are available, purchasing additional software may not be necessary. Users report satisfaction with AVG for its user-friendly features, such as scheduled sweeps and email checks, while noting that basic protection can be achieved with free software combined with a firewall and a router. Concerns about user behavior, such as clicking unknown email links, highlight that software cannot fully mitigate risks associated with user actions. Additionally, there are indications that Microsoft Security Essentials may be bundled with future Windows versions, although this has faced opposition from other anti-virus companies regarding competitive practices.
mathman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
8,130
Reaction score
573
The latest issue of Consumer Reports has a discussion of anti-virus software (free and pay). Between free and pay there isn't any significant difference in performance between the four free programs and the better pay programs. The main thing that pay programs offer are complete packages including firewall and anti-spam. Since you can get free firewall and anti-spam separately, there seems to be no advantage to buying anything.

The four free packages studied (in rating order) were Avira, AVG, Avast, and Microsoft security essentials. However the differences were quite small.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
mathman said:
The latest issue of Consumer Reports has a discussion of anti-virus software (free and pay). Between free and pay there isn't any significant difference in performance between the four free programs and the better pay programs. The main thing that pay programs offer are complete packages including firewall and anti-spam. Since you can get free firewall and anti-spam separately, there seems to be no advantage to buying anything.

The four free packages studied (in rating order) were Avira, AVG, Avast, and Microsoft security essentials. However the differences were quite small.

I'd agree. I used all four and only use AVG because I'm most used to it. The security package deals really aren't needed. AVG Free + MS Firewall + behind a router, will sufficiently protect 99% of responsible users.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
I'd agree. I used all four and only use AVG because I'm most used to it. The security package deals really aren't needed. AVG Free + MS Firewall + behind a router, will sufficiently protect 99% of responsible users.

I prefer AVG also among the first three. The main reason is that it has two features (schedules sweeps and e-mail check) while the other two each have only one (Avira has scheduled sweeps and Avast has e-mail check). I have never tried the Microsoft security.
 
A specific "email checking" option is probably a historical left-over now. Since MS provided an programming interface with a clean way to get access to email attachments just the same as any other files on disk, any half reasonable anti virus program should scan them anyway without needing a special options.

Of course clicking on links in an "unknown" email is a different issue, but it's rather hard for any software to fix user stupidity, only the consequences of it after the event!

Rumor has it that the equivalent of MSE will be bundled with Windows 8. I believe it would have been bundled with earlier versions of windows, except the other anti-virus companies started howling about anti-competitive busness practices.
 
Alternatively:

linux_user_at_best_buy.png


:biggrin:
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
16K
Replies
47
Views
17K
Back
Top