Is Proper Time Invariance Proven?

thoughtgaze
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
is proper time invariant? proof? thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thoughtgaze said:
is proper time invariant? proof? thanks...

Proper time is invariant by definition. It's the time read on a clock, for that clock.

It's similar in a way to the probability of throwing a six on a die. Before you start, the chances of getting a six are 1/6. Once you have thrown the die and got a six, the chances of having a six are 1/1.

Similarly, you can manipulate your scenario to get whatever proper time you want, and to that extent it is variable. But once you have your proper time (which has been read from a clock, for that clock), it's invariant.

cheers,

neopolitan
 
thoughtgaze said:
is proper time invariant? proof? thanks...

Yes, it is invariant; by almost by definition. Proper time is the time measured by a clock in a given world line. What you can prove are that the co-ordinate transforms conserve proper time.

Here is a proof for special relativity, that proper time is invariant under the Lorentz transformation.

The increment in proper time du for a clock moving a small distance dx in a small time dt is, by definition
du^2 = dt^2 - (dx/c)^2​

That is for any inertial co-ordinate system.

Suppose we transform to a new co-ordinate system. The Lorenz transformations are
\begin{align*}<br /> t&#039; &amp; = \gamma ( t - vx/c^2 ) \\<br /> x&#039; &amp; = \gamma ( x - vt ) \\<br /> \intertext{Where}<br /> \gamma &amp; = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2)}} \\<br /> \intertext{Hence}<br /> dt&#039; &amp; = \gamma ( dt - (v/c^2).dx ) \\<br /> dx&#039; &amp; = \gamma ( dx - v.dt ) \\<br /> \intertext{Hence}<br /> dt&#039;^2 - (dx&#039;/c)^2 &amp; = \gamma^2 ( ( dt - (v/c^2).dx )^2 - ( dx/c - (v/c).dt )^2 ) \\<br /> &amp; = \gamma^2 ( dt^2 - 2(v/c)(dx/c).dt + (v/c)^2.(dx/c)^2 - (dx/c)^2 + 2(v/c).(dx/c).dt - (v/c)^2.dt^2) \\<br /> &amp; = \gamma^2 ( 1 - (v/c)^2 ) ( dt^2 - (dx/c)^2 ) \\<br /> &amp; = dt^2 - (dx/c)^2<br /> \end{align}​
 
sylas said:
Yes, it is invariant; by almost by definition. Proper time is the time measured by a clock in a given world line. What you can prove are that the co-ordinate transforms conserve proper time.

Here is a proof for special relativity, that proper time is invariant under the Lorentz transformation.

bravo, this is all i needed to see thank you very much :)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top