B Is quantum entanglement a four dimensional force?

Meruem
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Why two bodies are related with each other despite the distance between them. It is unbelievable that entanglement exist regardless of any distance. Why on universe are so deeply connected with each other where distance does not play any role for the phenomena?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meruem said:
Why two bodies are related with each other despite the distance between them. It is unbelievable that entanglement exist regardless of any distance. Why on universe are so deeply connected with each other where distance does not play any role for the phenomena?
The universe works the way it works. It doesn't care whether you believe it or not. Entanglement is definitely counter-intuitive but it is what it is.
 
Sorry to say that but I wanted to know about the reason behind existence of quantum entanglement.
 
Meruem said:
Sorry to say that but I wanted to know about the reason behind existence of quantum entanglement.
There are various ways to prepare quantum objects so that one of their properties becomes entangled. Thereafter, there is no separate state for that property between the two objects but only a single state. It's complicated.
 
Last edited:
I don't think we actually know the underlying mechanisms of entanglement and esp. as it might relate to "four dimensions", but isn't this is more a QM forum post than a sci-fi / fantasy one?
 
Meruem said:
I wanted to know about the reason behind existence of quantum entanglement.

If you are asking how it comes about in the math of QM, you're basically asking for an entire course in QM. That's beyond the scope of a PF discussion.

If you're asking why the universe works the way it does, nobody knows, and anyway that's not a question physics can answer.

Either way your question is unanswerable, so I am closing this thread.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top