Is the Contracted Metric Equal to the Dimension of the Manifold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Decimal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
Decimal
Messages
73
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


[/B]
For any metric ##g_{ab}## show that ##g_{ab} g^{ab} = N## where ##N## is the dimension of the manifold.

Homework Equations



$$ g_{ab} = \mathbf {e_a} \cdot \mathbf {e_b} $$
$$ g^{ab} = \mathbf {e^a} \cdot \mathbf {e^b} $$

The Attempt at a Solution



When I substitute the above equations I get the following: $$ g_{ab} g^{ab} = (\mathbf {e_a} \cdot \mathbf {e_b}) \cdot (\mathbf {e^a} \cdot \mathbf {e^b})$$ $$ g_{ab} g^{ab} =(\mathbf {e_a} \cdot \mathbf {e^a}) \cdot (\mathbf {e_b} \cdot \mathbf {e^b}) = 1 $$

So I arrive at a scalar 1 when contracting the tensor, which I think is to be expected, since the covariant and contravariant metric are each others inverses. However I don't see how this is then supposed to equal the dimension of the manifold. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh wow, I completely forgot that that applies at the end as well. Thanks a lot!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top