Is the Daytona 500 Winning Margin Calculation Accurate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thetexan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Margin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the accuracy of the winning margin calculation for the Daytona 500, specifically regarding Denny Hamlin's victory over Martin Truex. Participants question the reported margin of .011 seconds, suggesting that calculations based on a winning distance of 12 inches yield an implausibly low speed of 61.983 mph. Instead, using an average speed of 195 mph, the margin could be as short as .00349 seconds, with a distance of 8 or 9 inches potentially making it even less. There is also debate about the actual distance between the cars at the finish line, with estimates ranging from 4 to 14 inches based on photo analysis. The conversation highlights the complexity of accurately measuring such tight finishes in racing.
thetexan
Messages
269
Reaction score
13
Am I crazy (don't answer that) or what? Every article I read about the Daytona 500 race shows that Denny Hamlin nudged Martin Truex by .011 of an second. According to my calculation if you use 12 inches as the winning distance (could be 8 or 9) that would make their speed at the finish 61.983 mph??! That clearly is not correct. The speed ranged from about 187 to 197 with 195 about average.

Based on 195 at the finish line (they were floor boarded at that point) according to my calculations that would make the margin .00349 of a second! A distance of 8 or 9 inches would make the time interval even shorter.

Am I missing something here?

tex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought I read (can't recall where) that the distance between them was 4 inches!
 
thetexan said:
Am I crazy (don't answer that) or what? Every article I read about the Daytona 500 race shows that Denny Hamlin nudged Martin Truex by .011 of an second. According to my calculation if you use 12 inches as the winning distance (could be 8 or 9) that would make their speed at the finish 61.983 mph??! That clearly is not correct. The speed ranged from about 187 to 197 with 195 about average.

Based on 195 at the finish line (they were floor boarded at that point) according to my calculations that would make the margin .00349 of a second! A distance of 8 or 9 inches would make the time interval even shorter.

Am I missing something here?

tex
Reference link?
 
It was reported as .0010 or .0011 second, and less than 6 inches. At around 195 mph, that would be about 3.78 inches. The photos seem to show a bigger lead than that, although the location of the splitter versus windshield versus tires could be different on the two body profiles.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/vc1mcxo9qlpzyrablggr.jpg
vc1mcxo9qlpzyrablggr.jpg
 
It looks to me that the distance is about 8-12 inches. Hamlin's car is at the checker edge of the yellow strip which looks to be about 4-5 inches wide. Truex's car looks to be about 10 inches from the car edge of the yellow stripe. So that makes the distance about 12-14 inches approximately. Based on several other angles of the photo finish that 12-14 seems good. In any case we're talking thousanths of seconds not hundredths.

tex
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top