Is the distance relative also?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xponential
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
xponential
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
From the special theory of relativity, I understand that time is not absolute but relative according to the speed of observer. For instance, suppose there are two watches, one put inside a spaceship which rotates the Earth and the other is just stationed on Earth and both of them are synchronized firstly to have the same time reading. Let's consider now that the spaceship rotated the Earth 100 times at half the speed of light and then stopped. Then, if we looked at the current time readings on both watches, they will be significantly different.

Is that also applied to distance? If there is a device in the spaceship which tells to those inside it how much distance (in km) the ship has been moving so far (like the one in the car), and after the ship was stopped, will the reading of the device be different (i.e. much less) than if we got the length of the spaceship's path around the Earth and multiplied it by 100 (since there were 100 rotations)?

Thanks for your interest.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
will the reading of the device be different (i.e. much less) than if we got the length of the spaceship's path around the Earth and multiplied it by 100 (since there were 100 rotations)?
Of course. It will show ship time * 0.5*c, that's the definition of velocity. This is less than 100 orbits as seen from earth.
 
xponential said:
Is that also applied to distance? If there is a device in the spaceship which tells to those inside it how much distance (in km) the ship has been moving so far (like the one in the car)

How does such a device work?

You can't watch the space go by.

Scenario 1: if you have a relativistic train and you count the number of rail ties that you pass, you will get the same number as the observer at the station. However, if you examine them through a trapdoor in the bottom of the train, you will measure them to be closer together. If you use the shorter span as your basis, then sure you saw a shorter distance in your voyage.

Scenario 2: at speed, you use RADAR to find the range to your destination. You find a much shorter distance than you did when you measured it before starting out. At the end of the journey, which value to you report in your log book?
 
JDługosz said:
How does such a device work?
At the end of the journey, which value to you report in your log book?

I think it should be, then, the shorter value.

JDługosz & Ich, thank you very much for the clarification.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top