Is the Nitrogen in NH3 sp3 or sp2 + 2p ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hammad Shahid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nitrogen
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the reaction between ammonia (NH3) and boron trifluoride (BF3), focusing on the bonding dynamics and hybridization of NH3. It highlights that boron bonds with the lone pair of NH3, which is typically hybridized as sp3 due to its tetrahedral structure. However, the presence of a lone pair complicates the energy diagram representation, as it suggests NH3 has no lone pair to donate to BF3. Participants note that the lone pair occupies a significant volume and behaves similarly to an isolated p orbital, leading to confusion about how to accurately depict NH3 in energy diagrams. The conversation emphasizes that energy diagrams, particularly molecular orbital (MO) diagrams, may not effectively represent the true structure and bonding of molecules like NH3, which requires hybridization concepts to explain observed bond angles and dipole moments. The limitations of MO diagrams are acknowledged, suggesting they oversimplify the complexities of molecular structures.
Hammad Shahid
Messages
64
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
I want to draw out the product of the reaction between NH3 and BF3.
In the reaction between NH3 and BF3, the boron will bond with the extra lone pair in NH3. This is only possible if we let Nitrogen stay unhybridized. However, the molecular structure for NH3 is tetrahedral (and is therefore hybridized as sp3) due to distancing the e- pairs.
If we go by this model, however, NH3 has no lone pair to donate to the empty orbital of BF3.

Also, how is it that NH3 contains a lone pair but does not show that in energy diagram. From what I know, if an element has a lone pair, it will be an unhybridized orbital in the energy diagram.

Thanks for any help.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It’s a distorted SP3. The lone pair occupies a large volume and the barrier to inversion with respect to nitrogen is fairly low so it behaves a lot like an isolated p suborbital.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
chemisttree said:
It’s a distorted SP3. The lone pair occupies a large volume and the barrier to inversion with respect to nitrogen is fairly low so it behaves a lot like an isolated p suborbital.
Alright. So for the energy diagram, how would I draw this? Sp3 or Sp2 + 2p2 ?
 
Draw it like an SP3. Energy diagrams are not extremely useful for visualizing structures though. You do realize that the energy of an unshared electron pair is different than bonded electrons? So that the energy diagram of ammonia will look different than something like methane even though both are SP3?



 
Last edited:
chemisttree said:
Draw it like an SP3. Energy diagrams are not extremely useful for visualizing structures though. You do realize that the energy of an unshared electron pair is different than bonded electrons? So that the energy diagram of ammonia will look different than something like methane even though both are SP3?




Yes I know that. That's why I'm confused on why the energy diagram would have it as an sp3 hybridization rather than show the lone pair separately.
 
What are you calling an “Energy Diagram?” An MO diagram?

If you are referring to the MO diagram you must acknowledge that hybridization is used to explain what is wrong given a particular MO diagram interpretation. Without hybridization, carbon can only form two bonds rather than the four that we see in the real world. Likewise, a strict MO interpretation for ammonia gives us a localized electron pair in an s suborbital and three non-equivalent combinations of 1s and 2p suborbitals. This is not reality. The observed energies and bond angles don’t fit the MO handwaving description at all.
Something must be invoked to explain the H-N-H bond angles of 107 degrees (not 90!) and the observed dipole moment (not ~0!). So hybridization is invoked to explain these differences. Rather than a combination of atomic orbitals, a combination of hybridized atomic orbitals is used.

These diagrams are a bit like using a cartoon to explain real life. You get the gist of it but details are lacking. I will say it again... MO diagrams aren’t extremely useful for visualizing structures or predicting them.
 
Last edited:
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top