Is the Orthogonal Complement of a Subspace of (Rn) Also a Subspace of (Rn)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter robierob12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
robierob12
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Prove that the orthogonal complement of a subspace of (Rn) is itself a subspace of (Rn)

-----------------------------------------------------

Let V be the orthogonal complement of S, S a subspace of (Rn).

Let the set of vectors that span (Rn) be written as the columns of matrix A.

consider the homogenous equation

A(transpose)u=0

The solution space of the vectors u will all dot with any row vector from A transpose equaling zero.

So the null space of A transpose is the subspace V.

By (Fundamental Subspace Theroem) Two subspaces, Column space of a matricies transpose and the nullspace of that same matrix form a direct sum of (Rn).

Thus V is also a subspace of (Rn)

Does this make sense?
Am I trying way too hard here becuase this seems like it should be an easy one.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yea, that seems about right, although I think you want the columns to span S, not R^n.

It would probably be a good exercise to try to prove this directly from the definition of the orthogonal complement of a subspace, rather than appealing to that theorem.
 
I wouldn't do anything that complicated. In particular, there is no reason to appeal to "matrices". A subset of a vector space is a subspace if and only if au+ bv is a membere of subset whenever u and v are members of the subset and a and b scalars. If u and v are members of v and w a member of S, what is the innerproduct of (au+bv) with w?
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top